Answer:
Nepal has undergone and is consistently undergoing changes in its governance, and structure of society for which it has lead to frequent changes in the constitution.
Explanation:
The Government of Nepal act 1948, was changed because there were no democratic rights in the Constitution.
The first democratic constitution enacted in the year 1959 was scrapped by the King of Nepal because he felt that the constitution is trying to reduce his powers.
The next constitution enacted in 1962 was scrapped after a short period of time because it was an anti democratic constitution.
In the year 1990 the King of Nepal used the constitution for selfish needs.
You are right the U.S is in the Northern Hemisphere and the Western Hemisphere.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
In the Schenck v. United States case, the US Supreme Court decided that the First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented a clear and present danger to society. Because of that, freedom of speech is not an absolute right, the government could restrict speech if the the words mean a clear and present danger to society.
Answer:
Customer contact
Explanation:
In business, customer contact can be seen as the physical presence of a customer in a service system.
There are high customer contact services and low customer contact services.
Services with high customer contact include those that there is need for the business to have the physical presence of the customer around the service premises to function better. they include:
Health centers, public transportation, fitness centers, schools and restaurants
Services with low customer contact include those that there is no need for the business to have the physical presence of the customer around the service premises to function better. they include:
Chemical plants, manufacturing companies.
Democracy is the rule of "demos" - people. However, it is not the case that all people want the same and that people can agree on what is important. Because of this, it is important that a compromise is reached in which everyone profits a bit : otherwise emocracy could "stall" due to conflicts (which is actually often the case in governments where the ruling party has only slight majority).
