You can solve this problem and calculate the height of the pole, by following the steps below:
Tan(α)=Opposite leg/Adjacent leg
α is the angle of elevation (α=<span>67°).
</span> The opposite leg is <span>the height of the pole. Let's call it "x".
</span> Adjacent leg=137 feet
When you substitute these values into the formula Tan(α)=Opposite leg/Adjacent leg, you have:
Tan(α)=Opposite leg/Adjacent leg
Tan(67°)=x/137
You must clear the "x"
x=137xTan(67°)
x=322.75
W<span>hat is the height of the pole?</span>
The answer is: The height of the pole is 322.75 feet.
Using the formula u should get 302.3
You can not divide by zero in math.
The answer is true.
Method 1:
The given function is a cubic function. And inverse of a cubic function is also a function.
Method 2:
Since the function is one-to-one function i.e it passes the horizontal line test, its function will pass the vertical line test which is a test if a relation is a function or not.
So, yes the inverse of G(x) will be a function.
Answer:
x (378) + y (378) =
Step-by-step explanation:
First i split 756.00 in half so basically what ever is multiplied by two to get 756 and i got 378. So since x = 3.00 and y = 2.00, it would come out to this:
3.00 x 378 = x (378) =
2.00 x 378 = y (378) =
So:
x (378) + y (378) =
im sorry if i got it wrong-
