Answer: Social comparison
Explanation: According to the theory of social comparison, given by psychologist Leon Festinger, it is a process of self-evaluation by comparing our abilities and skills with others. It is also a process of self-realisation in terms of our beliefs, aspirations, attitudes, and not just skills. In this way we acquire a far more realistic and accurate picture of ourselves, as well as determine our own personal and social value. Social comparison can also be an impetus for further advancement and self-development when we see how much others are better than us in a field, so it can also be a source of motivation and impetus.
Children can create an incorrect, unrealistic picture of themselves for understandable reasons, as in this case, without seeing the rest of the kids in the class and their dancing skills. Adults can also have misconceptions about their skills and beliefs, say for different reasons and circumstances, but in people there is a tendency to measure themselves with others. This means a tendency to evaluate themselves, their skills and beliefs as accurately as possible, the tendency towards accurate self-evaluation.
Answer:D)Effective communication.
Effective communication is the process of exchanging feelings, opinion,thoughts,views and information in such a way that the purpose of the exchange is acheived.
It is the presentation of information by the sender in a way that is best understood by the receiver.
Effective communication is very important in our day to day life as it promotes good interpersonal relationship among individuals.
Explanation:
Only 7 percent of Germans were nazis
Answer: A. Psychodynamic
Explanation: According to psychodynamic theory, internal, both conscious and unconscious forces, desires, beliefs, learned behaviors, influence and shape behavior to the greatest extent. Proponents of this theory are of the opinion that these forces, desires, etc., are formed on the basis of childhood experience. So these are learned patterns over which people have little awareness, most often these patterns occur unconsciously.
Explanation: Residential segregation is, by definition, primarily geographical, but in urban conditions, the spatial isolation and separation of different social groups within geographical area. Social groups are usually classified by their social status, ranging from poor, slightly richer, rich, etc. Residential segregation can be deepened and viewed as racial, ethnic, national, but here is about residential segregation on the basis of social status, thus the segregation of settlements where the poor live. Housing policy has always been profit-driven, among other things, so in certain areas, housing for the poor at a certain price and high population density has been designed. The so-called social housing at a social price are apartments that the poor can only afford. As the high density of settlements and the low cost are affordable for the poor, only the poor will live in such settlements, therefore separate.
The flourishing of such settlements, so residential segregation, is influenced, among other things, by historical circumstances, i.e increased immigration or not. Then there are the trends of time and the need for labour, therefore the current causes, as well as the life chances and opportunities of such social groups.
Such neighbourhoods that are separated are usually unsafe, there is a lot of crime and danger as the poor live in such settlements. This does not mean that the poor are criminals, they simply live in a poor environment and see it as the only way out. The conclusion is that residential segregation is adversely affects precisely poor and minorities, because they are exposed to an environment where the only thing they see as a way out is crime.