One change that would make a positive difference would be the direct election of the president through popular vote. Currently, the Electoral College votes are given through the "winner-takes-all" method, which happens when ALL of a state's Electoral College votes are given to the nominee that won a majority of the popular vote in that state. An example would be how, in the recent election, all of Arizona's Electoral College votes went to Trump because he gained the majority of the popular votes in that state. However, because the Electoral College runs on this method, it essentially ignores a large number of votes for other candidates, such as Clinton. So, if the Electoral College was abolished, the president that would be elected would be the one that got the most votes from the American people.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
the answer is c i just took the quiz
Explanation:
While this is purely speculation, it is likely that Germany would have successfully taken over continental Europe and the UK would have had to become subservient in some manner.
America would likely be the same but it would have a much more diminished role in global affairs.
A negotiation fro Great Britain
Profit earned by the colonists from selling crops to European buyers would most likely be spent on D. manufactured goods from Europe like cloth.
This is because the colonies didn't have that much of a manufacturing system. They could get raw timber from their land, they depended on the Caribbean to get exotic goods like sugar, but depended on Africa for the slaves, and Canada didn't have the means to produce machinery at the time.