The American colonies differ from other colonies in the British empire because of diverse cultures, ect.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options for this question we can say the following.
How did the League of Nations respond to genocide prior to 1945?
The League of Nations responded to genocide prior to 1945 in a weak way. The League of Nations failed to politically and militarily challenge this terrible act.
The League of Nations was a forum to resolve disputes among member countries. Through its charter, member nations pledged to act collectively against any country that attacked a member country. However, in reality, it did never had the proper organization and coordination to address important issues such as genocide.
The League of Nations was formed after World War 1 in order to prevent another armed conflict. It was the precursor of the United Nations. United States President Woodrow Wilson was one of the most important supporters of the idea although, in the end, the United States decided no to be part of the League.
I think the second one might be the answer but please let me know if Im wrong
Where answers B, C and D have inaccuracies in one or more parts, answer A is the only correct answer.
Answer:
One characteristic of Indian armies was their inability or lack of desire to engage in protracted warfare, or guerrilla tactics. Ancient China in the warring states period featured the mass-mobilization of thousands of peasant soldiers who fought for years at a time, leading to enormous social disruption and famines.
Explanation:
Hope it helps
