Where is the question.?.?
Автор и ведущий специалист в этой связи в России и Белоруссии не могу уснуть и проснуться с хорошим человеком в любых ситуациях и не могу понять почему не знаю что я люблю его очень люблю тебя щ не знаю как я не могу понять что это за счёт чего это ты так как
The statement that describes the distinction between British and French rule in Africa is D. France used direct rule, while Britain used indirect rule.
It should be noted that the main difference between the way the French and the British ruled African countries was that while the French used direct rule, the British used indirect rule.
The indirect rule implies a form of government whereby the governed people have certain legal, administrative, and other powers. While the British still have certain powers over the people they ruled, the French were direct in their approach.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25555071
Answer:The first crematorium and gas chamber, and the two “bunkers,” were withdrawn from use in 1943, when the four large crematoria and gas chambers in Birkenau went into operation.
The gas chamber in crematorium I in the Auschwitz main camp was used for the last time in December 1942, although the crematorium furnaces there functioned until July 1943.
The crematorium I building was adapted as an air-raid shelter in 1944. The first provisional gas chamber, bunker 1, was demolished in 1943, while the second, returned to operational use in the spring of 1944, was demolished in the fall of 1944.
As part of the overall liquidation of the evidence of crime, crematoria II and III together with their gas chambers were partially dismantled in late 1944, and blown up in January 1945. Crematorium IV was partially burned during the Sonderkommando mutiny on October 7, 1944, and later dismantled. Crematorium V functioned until the very end, and was blown up on January 26, 1945, the day before the liberation of the camp.
Explanation:
He believed in 2 things which might help you. I don't really know what term you are looking for, but here are the two things he brought to the table.
1. He was very concerned about states rights believing that the states should have the balance of power shifted to them.
2. He believed that domestic policy had to be addressed rather than war and terrorism which is what Bush emphasized.
He was accused of being more of a socialist than a federalist (which might even be true). You could call him a social democrat.
