1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BigorU [14]
3 years ago
9

The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia was primarily a result of. A) an extreme political ideology. B) a religious war. C) a swift shift fr

om an agricultural to industrial economy. D) an ethnic conflict.
History
2 answers:
cestrela7 [59]3 years ago
8 0
The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia was primarily a result of an extreme political ideology. Cambodians have Vietnamese influence and had desire to kick the French out. When their civilization suffers, they resorted to extremism. 

The answer would be letter A.
Degger [83]3 years ago
4 0
The correct answer to this question is "A) an extreme political ideology." <span>The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia was primarily a result of. A) an extreme political ideology. There was n</span>o religious war, no huge shift between agricultural styles and the war fought in Cambodia by that group was against a Cambodian politician, so not an ethnic clash.
You might be interested in
How did colonist in the 1600's provide for their basic needs?<br> please help!!!???
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

When the London Company sent out its first expedition to begin colonizing Virginia on December 20, 1606, it was by no means the first European attempt to exploit North America. In 1564, for example, French Protestants (Huguenots) built a colony near what is now Jacksonville, Florida. This intrusion did not go unnoticed by the Spanish, who had previously claimed the region. The next year, the Spanish established a military post at St. Augustine; Spanish troops soon wiped out the French interlopers residing but 40 miles away.

Meanwhile, Basque, English, and French fishing fleets became regular visitors to the coasts from Newfoundland to Cape Cod. Some of these fishing fleets even set up semi-permanent camps on the coasts to dry their catches and to trade with local Indians, exchanging furs for manufactured goods. For the next two decades, Europeans' presence in North America was limited to these semi-permanent incursions. Then in the 1580s, the English tried to plant a permanent colony on Roanoke Island (on the outer banks of present-day North Carolina), but their effort was short-lived.

In the early 1600s, in rapid succession, the English began a colony (Jamestown) in Chesapeake Bay in 1607, the French built Quebec in 1608, and the Dutch began their interest in the region that became present-day New York. Within another generation, the Plymouth Company (1620), the Massachusetts Bay Company (1629), the Company of New France (1627), and the Dutch West India Company (1621) began to send thousands of colonists, including families, to North America. Successful colonization was not inevitable. Rather, interest in North America was a halting, yet global, contest among European powers to exploit these lands.

There is another very important point to keep in mind:  European colonization and settlement of North America (and other areas of the so-called "new world") was an invasion of territory controlled and settled for centuries by Native Americans. To be sure, Indian control and settlement of that land looked different to European, as compared to Indian, eyes. Nonetheless, Indian groups perceived the Europeans' arrival as an encroachment and they pursued any number of avenues to deal with that invasion. That the Indians were unsuccessful in the long run in resisting or in establishing a more favorable accommodation with the Europeans was as much the result of the impact on Indians of European diseases as superior force of arms. Moreover, to view the situation from Indian perspectives ("facing east from Indian country," in historian Daniel K. Richter's wonderful phrase) is essential in understanding the complex interaction of these very different peoples.

Finally, it is also important to keep in mind that yet a third group of people--in this case Africans--played an active role in the European invasion (or colonization) of the western hemisphere. From the very beginning, Europeans' attempts to establish colonies in the western hemisphere foundered on the lack of laborers to do the hard work of colony-building. The Spanish, for example, enslaved the Indians in regions under their control. The English struck upon the idea of indentured servitude to solve the labor problem in Virginia. Virtually all the European powers eventually turned to African slavery to provide labor on their islands in the West Indies. Slavery was eventually transferred to other colonies in both South and North America.

Because of the interactions of these very diverse peoples, the process of European colonization of the western hemisphere was a complex one, indeed. Individual members of each group confronted situations that were most often not of their own making or choosing. These individuals responded with the means available to them. For most, these means were not sufficient to prevail. Yet these people were not simply victims; they were active agents trying to shape their own destinies. That many of them failed should not detract from their efforts.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Explain the changes over time that occured during the paleolithic to neolithic period
vazorg [7]

Answer:

People lived more towards lakes and rivers instead of caves, and tree trunks. This led to the change of the jobs of the society. Unlike Paleolithic time's, man could have more leisure time to spend. This led him to broaden the society he was living in and led to increased populations in the Neolithic Age.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Austronesians brought human settlement to islands of the Pacific Ocean.<br> O True<br> O False
Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:

True is the answer

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Was the Veto Power supported by Federalist or Anti-Fed? Why?
Dafna11 [192]

Answer:

As in any debate there were two sides, the Federalists who supported ratification and the Anti-Federalists who did not. We now know that the Federalists prevailed, and the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788, and went into effect in 1789.

7 0
3 years ago
What battle is considered the turning point for the North? *
dezoksy [38]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Gettysburg .is the turning point

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • · the Maine · the Rough Riders · "Yellow Press" · San Juan Hill All of these terms are associated with which conflict? A) World
    10·2 answers
  • 6. What were the effects of Islamic expansion on Christianity?
    13·1 answer
  • What means did muhammad use to defeat the meccans and unite the tribes of arabia under the banner of islam? force only diplomacy
    14·1 answer
  • Until khan united them, the mongols lived in separate tribes in the _____________.
    13·2 answers
  • in the early 1930s, millions of ukrainians died as a result of... trench warfare, glasnost, perestroika, collectivization
    8·1 answer
  • Witch of the following events gave the frist humans the ability to migrate from asia to america?
    10·2 answers
  • Explain the role of nationalism in the unifications of Italy and Germany.
    12·1 answer
  • How did explorers inspire change?
    13·1 answer
  • In order for suburbs to grow in post-World War II America, which of the following
    12·1 answer
  • How did geography influence what Sumerian and Babylonian grew
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!