1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
makkiz [27]
3 years ago
12

Which type of art has no visible subject

History
2 answers:
Vinil7 [7]3 years ago
7 0
The visual arts are art forms such as ceramics, drawing, painting, sculpture, printmaking, design, crafts, photography, video, filmmaking, and architecture.
luda_lava [24]3 years ago
4 0
The type of art with no visible subject is abstract art 

You might be interested in
Which of the following Supreme Court cases ruled that school sponsored prayer by clergy at a graduation was unconstitutional? En
anastassius [24]

  Althought every case presented in the options was about an aspect of religion in schools the one which ruled that school sponsored prayer by clergy at a graduation was unscontitutional is <em>"Lee v. Weisman"</em> .

  It was the first major school prayer case decided by the Rehnquist court on the year 1992.

<h3>   <u>Context</u></h3>

  Robert E. Lee was the principal of Nathan Bishop Middle School in Providence, Rhode Island. He invited a rabbi to present a prayer at the 1989 graduation ceremony, Deborah Weisman was a student from that class and her parents requested a temporary injunction to ban the rabbi´s presentation. At first instance the Rhode Island court denied the Weisman´s motion, nevertheless the Wesiman family still attended to the graduation and the rabbi gave his speech.

  The Weisman family continued their litigation after the graduation and won in the First Circuit Court of Appeals. The argument of the family was an interpretation of the <em>"Establishment clause"</em>  that sustained the free excercise of religion throughout the country and prohibit the congress to sanction a law about establishing a determinated religion. The interpretation which the family and the Supreme Court held was a broad interpretation.

  After having lost in the First Circuit Court of Appeals the school district appealed to the Supreme Court under the argument that the prayer was nonsectarian and doubly voluntary, Deborah was free not to stand for the prayer and the participation in the ceremony wasn´t obligatory neither.

<h3>   <u>Decision</u> </h3>

  On june 24, 1992 the decision was announced and, as I wrote in the last paragraph, it was a win for the Weisman family as the Court accept the arguements presented by them and reject the ones presented by the school district making special emphasis on the one which said that the attend of Deborah to the graduation was voluntary:

<em>"To say a teenage student has a real choice not to attend her high school graduation is formalistic in the extreme. True, Deborah could elect not to attend commencement without renouncing her diploma; but we shall not allow the case to turn on this point. Everyone knows that, in our society and in our culture, high school graduation is one of life's most significant occasions. A school rule which excuses attendance is beside the point. Attendance may not be required by official decree, yet it is apparent that a student is not free to absent herself from the graduation exercise in any real sense of the term "voluntary," for absence would require forfeiture of those intangible benefits which have motivated the student through youth and all her high school years" </em>Anthony Kennedy.

I hope that the answer is correct and helps you. Regards

8 0
3 years ago
The early cities of Mohenjo-daro and Harappa were located?
Mars2501 [29]
Generally speaking, the early cities of Mohenjo-daro and Harappa were located "<span>A) On the coast of India", since these were part of the Indus Valley Civilization, which was located in this area. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Easy question: What continent is North Korea in?
Yuliya22 [10]
North Korea is in the continent of Asia.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
why did the federalists believe that the constitution would prevent the national government from gaining too much power
vfiekz [6]
The government was divided into three branches, judicial, legislative, and executive.  The federalist believed that the national government should take care of everything and have the ultimate authority, but the constitution limited what the branches could do, therefore, the federalist believed that the constitution gave the national government too much power. The Anti-Federalist argued that the constitution gave too much power to the federal government. The Federalist believed that the nation might not survive without the passing of the constitution, and that a stronger national government was necessary after the Articles of Confederation failed. 
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Washington use to help trap the British and defeat them
zheka24 [161]

Answer:

idk lol

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Order the following African kingdoms chronologically.
    8·2 answers
  • What is globalization give an example
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP
    5·2 answers
  • After a boycott of English goods put pressure on the government, the Townshend duties were repealed, except for the
    14·2 answers
  • Which region had little to none public school​
    10·1 answer
  • When did early hunter-gatherer societies move to new areas?
    12·1 answer
  • Where did Hammurabi get his power as a king
    14·1 answer
  • The Rough Riders, led by Teddy
    8·2 answers
  • Most Harappan seals were made of ..........
    12·2 answers
  • The Supreme Court struck down the<br> as unconstitutional because it limited free speech to adults.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!