1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elodia [21]
3 years ago
13

None of the following involve double jeopardy EXCEPT a. trying a person for the same crime in both the federal and the State cou

rts. b. trying a person for more than one crime committed during a single act. c. trying a case a second time in a higher court when the verdict has been appealed. d. trying a person for the same crime when a jury has already declared that person innocent.
History
1 answer:
Brrunno [24]3 years ago
6 0
<span>d. trying a person for the same crime when a jury has already declared that person innocent.</span>
You might be interested in
What's the first Amendment
Ilya [14]
<h3>What's the first Amendment</h3>

The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prevents the government from making laws which regulate an establishment of religion, prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the right to peaceably assemble, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

7 0
4 years ago
How did the rights of dalits, or lower-caste Indians, change in democratic India?
krek1111 [17]

The democratized India has forever banned the use of the caste system used by members of the Hindu religion. When the system was allowed, the Dalits were marginalized, had no rights guaranteed and could only perform works related to feces of the people of higher castes .With the end of the caste system, the Dalits should be considered ordinary citizens with equal rights and duties to the rest of the population.

The creation of the Atrocities Prevention Act in 1995 protected the Dalits from discriminating against superior castes. Anyone who disobeys this law would be automatically arrested without bail.


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The idea of the ______ south was the beginning of industrializaton and segregation in the south.
ASHA 777 [7]
The idea of the New South was the beginning of industrialization and segregation in the south
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What significance does the Holocaust have to current world events?
Bingel [31]

Answer:

One of the perks of being an educator at Holocaust Museum Houston is that thousands of students are touched by the work that we do, and the lessons we teach, each year. One of the downsides is that we only have a short time, with large groups of students, to convey the fundamental importance of this history, and make sure that every student in the room is impacted by what they have learned.  

Unfortunately, perhaps, we do hear all too often from students—as I am sure most history teachers do, that the Holocaust was a long time ago, and it doesn’t matter anymore. Or we hear, “I am not Jewish, so this does matter to me.” And we even have some young people say to us, “This is not my history or my people’s history, so I don’t care.” How wrong they are. History is important because of the roots that it created in societies all over the world. History shows us the paths to new languages, new geographical discoveries, and amendments to government. History also shares with us deeply important lessons that need to be heard and remembered by every single living person.  

The lessons of the Holocaust can be applied universally. This is not just a conversation about the history of the Jewish people, or the history of the Roma people in Germany during World War II. This is not even necessarily a story about World War II. The Holocaust is a deeply personal story about the effect that hatred and prejudice can have on a community. It is a story about millions of people who refused to use their voice to help others, and because of that refusal, millions of people lost their lives for no other reason than the belief that they were an inferior people. Are there any other historical events where we see hatred and prejudice impact communities? Are there current events in the world that share the experience of an apathetic population of people, determined to not get involved? Determined to remain “neutral?” Elie Wiesel once said, “We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.”

One of the key experiences shared by victims of the Holocaust, as well as other genocides and acts of hatred, is the perpetrator’s ability to dehumanize them. Dehumanization is the removal of human dignity, human rights, humanity in its entirety. Dehumanization is key to getting ordinary people to commit acts of violence and mass murder against their community members. This lesson is not exclusive to the Holocaust. Dehumanization, facilitated by the Nuremberg and Berlin Laws, in the Holocaust are just acts of legalized discrimination. In Rwanda, the Hutus called the Tutsis cockroaches and used the media to spread hate speech inspiring violent acts by the community. In Cambodia, people had their autonomy removed by the Khmer Rouge and were placed into a completely new society based on their designated trustworthiness. People being assigned uniforms, numbers, having their heads shaved, and not being allowed to speak their native languages, practice their cultural traditions, or honor their religious beliefs all play into dehumanization. We see dehumanization everywhere.  

The Holocaust matters to us because it is one of the most, if not the most, extensively documented instance of atrocity, hatred, dehumanization, and apathy in world history. The Holocaust also matters because as it was happening, the world stood by and watched—not just Germans, not just Europeans—the world. Today, we use the Holocaust to remember that we, as world citizens, can and must do better.

Explanation:

    im  a nerd with this stuff.  

8 0
3 years ago
What evidence does Las Casa give to show the cruelty of the Spaniards?
jarptica [38.1K]

They believed that the Spanish were sent from heaven, and as such treated them well until the cruelty started. Las Casas also portrays the weapons that the natives use similar to naïve boys.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where were the majority of industries
    6·1 answer
  • The confederation congress passed the land ordinance of 1785, which dealt with how lan was distributed in the Northwest Territor
    15·1 answer
  • By what time period does evidence of cultural sharing in Neolithic China begin? What was one impact of this sharing on the indiv
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following policies led to desegregation? fourteenth amendment fifteenth amendment immigration reform act civil righ
    7·2 answers
  • Put yourself in the shoes of the plane crash survivors. What would you have done in order
    7·1 answer
  • GIVING BRAINLIEST:) plz help
    5·1 answer
  • ¿Qué países fueron los principales enemigos de Napoleón? ¿Cuál fue el resultado de las guerras contra estos países?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is another term for claim in argumentative writing?
    9·1 answer
  • What did Truman tell MacArthur not to do and why?
    8·1 answer
  • This question has two parts. First, answer Part A. Then, answer Part B. Part A How did the start of the American Revolutionary W
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!