I would say the correct answer is - <span>to undermine the significance of his critics’ letter.
He is trying to say that he will answer those messages which are actually important, but will not spend any time responding to criticism because it is irrelevant. He wants to say that there are more pressing matters to deal with than what a mere critic has to say.
</span>
I'd say "Avenging his parents' murder". That just seems like more of an Anti-Hero kind of trait.
They where perceived as being victimized and cocky.
The answer is C: most societies do not allow the level of freedom necessary to achieve enlightenment.
Kant argues in the brief but extremely important essay, <em>What is Enlightenment?, </em>that society, before the age of Enlightenment, which Kant precisely defines in this essay, has behaved like a minor in as much as a child cannot think for himself but rather is given the guidelines for his behavior. Kant then claims that it is time for society, and everyone in it, to become an adult and dare think for one´s self, imposing the guidelines for thought and action based on one´s own transcendental discovery of the limits of thought, what can be thought, and what that, in practical terms, entails for every individual´s freedom. This moment in society could not have been reached without the achievements gained through the Enlightenment that provide the necessary and qualified freedom that society as a whole lacked before it.
The answer is “will be examining” . Future progressives are formed by subject + will be + verb(-ing)
