Answer:
- The difference between living expenses at Northwestern and her second choice but not how much she spent applying to Northwestern.
Explanation:
As per the description given, the 'difference between living expenses at Northwestern and her second choice but not how much she spent applying to Northwestern' as it exemplifies the opportunity cost that reflects the reason for capitulating the best alternative of 'expenses at Northwestern'(which is her best possible choice). Thus, if the amount spent on the second choice is lesser than her best alternative option then only the customer would be ready to bear the opportunity cost.
Answer:
public compliance without private acceptance
Explanation:
However, when they were with the confederates who sometimes gave an obviously wrong answer, 76% of participants gave the wrong answer at least once. This suggests that Asch's studies are an illustration of public compliance without private acceptance.
I want to say A . Hope this helps :)
The answer too your question is a
