1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Galina-37 [17]
3 years ago
8

Which of the following is NOT an example of organic solidarity? A. A Ford Motors employee assembling taillights on an assembly l

ine B. A freelance artist creating a sculpture of Barack Obama C. A fast-food employee putting burgers into their buns D. A toll-booth employee collecting toll change
Social Studies
1 answer:
snow_tiger [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Option B

Explanation:

  • Organic solidarity originates from the reliance that emerges from specialization of work and the complementarities between individuals—an advancement which happens in present day and mechanical social orders.  
  • Organic solidarity is social solidarity dependent on a division of work that outcomes in individuals relying upon one another; it stands out from mechanical solidarity. In human science, natural solidarity clarifies what ties mechanically progressed, industrialized social orders together.
You might be interested in
Classified items must be destroyed to avoid recognition or reconstruction. There are several authorized methods for destruction
notsponge [240]

Answer:

Pulverizing

Explanation:

Pulverizing is an authorized method of destruction.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the importance of energy? make a list.<br>​
zubka84 [21]

Answer:

We use energy to not only heat our human-made structures but we use it to cool them as well. Energy is necessary for getting up out of bed, walking down the street, or even lifting your finger. It's also necessary in abundance for all types of modern conveniences, from light bulbs to appliances to vehicles.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What mineral helps support Mexico’s growing steel industry
Goshia [24]
I Believe the answer is: <span>Iron and coke (low-sulfur coal).

For the past decades, </span><span>Iron and coke (low-sulfur coal) industry in Mexico has shown a healthy average of 6% Growth annually.
Because of the resources in </span><span>Iron and coke (low-sulfur coal), Mexico has always maintained the top 15 steel producers in the world.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP 50 POINTS!! AND BRAINLIST It would be super helpful if you have proof..
nevsk [136]

Answer:

million people died.

Italy joined the Allies.

4.The US effort to send supplies into West Berlin was called the

Warsaw Pact.

Marshall Plan.

Berlin

3 0
3 years ago
This ruling violated the recent
sammy [17]

Answer:

Maybe this will help

Explanation:

In a case later overruled by West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), the Supreme Court held in Minersville School District v. Gobitis, 310 U.S. 586 (1940), that state legislatures could require public school students to salute the U.S. flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance without violating students’ speech and religious rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.Minersville students refused to salute the flag for religious reasons

Public school students in Minersville, Pennsylvania, were required to begin the school day by reciting the Pledge of Allegiance while saluting the flag. However, two students, Lillian and William Gobitas (a court clerk erroneously changed the family’s last name to Gobitis), refused. They claimed that such a practice violated their religious principles; they were members of Jehovah’s Witnesses, who believed that saluting the flag was tantamount to paying homage to a graven image. After the students were expelled from school, their father filed suit, claiming that his children were being denied a free education and challenging the required pledge. Both the district court and the court of appeals ruled that the required salute and pledge were unconstitutional.

Court upheld compulsory salute and pledge

In an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court overruled the lower courts by upholding the compulsory salute and pledge. Writing for the Court, Justice Felix Frankfurter acknowledged that the First Amendment sought to avoid the “bitter religious struggles” of the past by prohibiting the establishment of a state religion and guaranteeing the free exercise of all religions. Yet the scope of this right to religious liberty could pose serious questions when, as in this case, individuals sought exemption from a generally applicable and constitutional law.

Citing a series of cases, beginning with the Court’s decision upholding anti-polygamy laws in Reynolds v. United States (1879), Frankfurter reaffirmed the principle that religious liberty had never included “exemption from doing what society thinks necessary for the promotion of some great common end, or from a penalty for conduct which appears dangerous to the general good.” In this case, the “great common end” was achieved through repetition of a “cohesive sentiment” represented by the salute and pledge to the flag, “the symbol of our national unity” that transcended all other differences.

Frankfurter defined the question in Gobitis as whether the Supreme Court could decide “the appropriateness of various means to evoke that unifying sentiment without which there can ultimately be no liberties, civil or religious,” or whether that decision should be left to the individual state legislatures and school districts. For Frankfurter and the majority of the Court, the decision obviously belonged to the legislatures and school boards. Although multiple methods were available for instilling “the common feeling for the common country” and some of those methods “may seem harsh and others no doubt are foolish,” it was for the legislatures and educators to decide, not the Court. The Constitution did not authorize the Supreme Court to become “the school board for the country.”

Stone said the compelled pledge should be unconstitutional

In his dissent, Justice Harlan Fiske Stone presaged the Court’s opinion three years later in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943) that would overrule the Gobitis decision. Conceding that constitutional guarantees of personal liberty are “not always absolutes,” Stone wrote that when legitimate conflicts arise between liberty and authority, the Court should seek “reasonable accommodation between them so as to preserve the essentials of both.” The Constitution did not indicate in any way that “compulsory expressions of loyalty play any . . .

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you require children in middle childhood to spend much needed time in quiet activities, they
    12·1 answer
  • Hw did jim crow laws get their name
    13·1 answer
  • What did serena williams do to become famous
    14·2 answers
  • The oldest known Indian culture period was the ?
    8·2 answers
  • When was the signing of the declaration of independence?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following theories explains why the Universe is expanding at a great speed?
    7·2 answers
  • The Prime Meridian is a line of
    5·2 answers
  • What is proofreading?
    15·2 answers
  • Which statements are facts about Ötzi? Choose three correct answers.
    5·2 answers
  • Can someone please help if you know. Thanks!
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!