Answer: B, a little England would be more likely to be vulnerable other countries
Explanation:
Two large armies met in the southern Pennsylvanian town of Gettysburg in the early days of July 1863. The engagement, which started as a skirmish between Union cavalry and Confederate troops searching for supplies, turned into one of the Civil War's bloodiest conflicts.
The final Union triumph at Gettysburg would significantly improve North morale and put a stop to Confederate General Robert E. Lee's audacious plan to invade the North. The fight, which is frequently cited as a crucial turning point in the conflict, would gain even more significance later that year when President Abraham Lincoln visited Gettysburg to dedicate the cemetery on the battlefield.
The cavalry regiments were scouting ahead to learn more about the enemy position even while the majority of the Army of the Potomac was still in Maryland, following Lincoln's instructions to remain in Maryland to maintain a buffer between Washington and the rebel army. The Confederate soldiers originally withdrew to Cashtown, but on July 1 they made the decision to return to Gettysburg and acquire the supplies they required, even if it meant confronting the Union troop.
Learn more about Battles here- brainly.com/question/25301695
#SPJ1
Answer:
A moral dilemma is shown here
Explanation:
Starting with the last word, <em>perfidy </em>is a deliberate breach of faith or trust; in the context of war - we can assume that this the case because of the word <em>peace</em><em> loving country</em> - perfidy can actually lead to warcrimes, like waving a white flag and then kill the enemy.
So the moral dilemma is that a country is very likely to be uncomfortable with a pact, the other side probably being a bit of a war loving country, but diplomatic relations deny the possibility of breaking the pact.
The part <em>not wishing to take the initiative of breaking the pact </em>is, if I´m not mistaken, a subordinate adjective clause that refers to the noun <em>country</em>.
So this country, not wishing etc., could not resort to perfidy either. Because that would be even worse, considering the fact that it is a peace loving country.
A homophone is a word that sound alike but is spelled differently like "A BEAR is chasing me" and " Look at the BARE skined tree" so I don't think there is a homophone for myself. sorry
Answer:
a). False
b). singular only
Explanation:
a). The adjective 'local' which denotes 'from or in a nearby location' exemplifies a base word. In this word, the suffix '-al' is joined with a bound morpheme 'loc-' to make it meaningful. Bound morphemes cannot stand on their own to convey meaning and thus, it requires another suffix or prefix to accomplish its meaning. Thus, the statement is false as the 'local' itself is a root word used with various suffixes to derive words like locally, localized, locality, etc.
b). Grammatically, <u>the noun 'news' is considered singular, as well as, uncountable and therefore, it carries a singular verb</u>. It remains the same irrespective of the singular or plural context in which it is being used. It doesn't carry an indefinite article as it specifies the number of the noun. The noun 'news' varies its meaning in the context which it is used in. However, the form remains 'singular only.'