Answer:
natural and probable consequence
Explanation:
The <u>natural and probable consequence</u> doctrine provides that a person encouraging or facilitating the commission of a crime will be held liable as an accomplice for the crime he or she aided and abetted as well as for the crimes that are a likely and feasible outcome of the criminal conduct
.
The natural and probable consequence doctrine states that an individual who aided another in committing a crime is liable for the crime committed and also for other related crimes which resulted in the process of committing that crime. For example, if an individual aids another the crime of home invasion and in the process occupants of the house where assaulted, according to the natural and probable consequence doctrine, the abettor is guilty of home invasion, assault even though he/she was not physically involved in the assault.
<span>There are no traits listed below to choose from with regards to this question. If I were to list some traits that I believe would indicate a potential problem with aggressive behavior, I would say that narcissism, inability to back down, propensity to always and always wants to be in charge.</span>
Ok hudjheejjejaushhjejebdbe can you show the question
Answer:
B) The southern economy was still based on agriculture and cotton, but now depended on sharecropping rather than slave labor.
Planning, zoning, and open-space preservation are examples of hazard mitigation actions in the "<span>c. natural resources protection" </span>category, since all of these measures have to to with protecting things that are already there, not adding new resources.
