The amendment that Paul can say has been violated here would be the 5th amendment.
<h3>What is the 5th amendment?</h3>
This is the amendment of the nation that states that the people of the nation would not have to held or made to answer for any capital or infamous crime except the indictment that they are being kept with is through that of a grand jury. Hence we can see that Paul is being kept illegally by the court.
Now from the case that we have being presented with we can see that the new judge is trying to subject the person of Paul two times to an offense that he committed which is illegal.
Read more on the eight amendment here
brainly.com/question/18716562
#SPJ1
A, I believe he didn’t do anything voting related.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
hope this helped
stay safe
brainliest is appreciated only 2 more to level up please help
Answer:
i am going to refer to <em><u>C</u></em> or <u><em>A</em></u> because he wanted to attack Houston and capture but since it says two wings to attack i would pick <u><em>C</em></u>
Explanation:
In April of 1836, Santa Anna learned that Houston was moving east. He divided his army in three: one part went on a failed attempt to capture the provisional government, another remained to protect his supply lines, and the third, which he commanded himself, went after Houston and his army.
No, it was not moral because it disrupts what they are already trying to fix. When the people come to take over, the people have no more freedom, they have to listen the people that take over. And the people that take over want money, resources, and land, so that makes it even worse for them because of the fact that they are going through all of their resources, and losing their land faster making them even more poor. Sometimes it isn't morally a good thing because many people can get killed or that the empire does not care about the country's health. Hope this helps! Have a good day.
<span>
</span>
