Carl Rogers believed<span> that for a </span>person<span> to achieve self-actualization they </span>must<span> be in a state of congruence. ... </span>Rogers<span> describes an </span>individual<span> who is actualizing as a </span>fully functioning person<span>. The main determinant of whether we will become self-actualized is childhood experience.
</span>
Answer:
Storm of Steel (in German: In Stahlgewittern) is the memoir of German officer Ernst Jünger's experiences on the Western Front during the First World War. It was originally printed privately in 1920, making it one of the first personal accounts to be published. The book is a graphic account of trench warfare. It was largely devoid of editorialization when first published, but was heavily revised several times.
Explanation:
Answer: the correct answer is D. Novelty/predictability.
Explanation:
Relational dialectics is an interpersonal communication theory about close personal bonds and relationships that highlights the issues, struggles and interplay between contrary tendencies. This theory, proposed respectively by Leslie Baxter and Barbara Montgomery in 1988, defines communication frameworks between relationship partners as the result of never ending dialectical tensions. The dialect is, in this case, novelty/predictability since Shelly has taken a novel action and Lincoln is predictable in the sense that he is schedule-oriented.
Scatter plot diagrams are made by plotting the data plots gathered in an x-y diagram. Then, the data points are fitted to an equation. Correlations come from this made equations. They are deemed legitimate through the coefficient of correlation r-squared. If it is as high as around 0.99, then the equation is a good correlation for the behavior of the data.
Answer:
A.admissible as habit evidence
Explanation:
A passenger of Dan sustained injuries and filed a lawsuit against him. The passenger( plaintiff) presented someone to testify about how Dan has a bad reputation for reckless driving in the community.
This testimony by White would most likely be admissible in the court of law because Dan already has a bad reputation of the action he’s been charged with in his community.This makes it admissible as habit evidence.