Centralized direction explain why we often overestimate how well we can predict future actions of others.
I hope that's help:0
Answer: Option E
Explanation: It is a known fact that a consumer gets excited more while doing offline shopping rather than the online shopping. Offline shopping through malls and stores gives the consumer advantage of live appearance and trial use in case of clothes and other such merchandize.
However the long lines for billing and other such lengthy procedures make it difficult.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is E.
Answer:
substitution and income effects will counteract each other totally
Explanation:
A labor supply curve is an economic analysis tool that shows the number or workers that are available to work or that can work at various wage rates.
The labor supply curve can either be bending backwards or sloping downwards or upward curving but it shows the relationship between labour and wage rates.
A labor supply curve can be affected by factors such as population, changes in social behaviour, opportunities in other markets, among other things.
From the above question, it is seen that a change in wage rate for Anthony from $25 to $29 does not affect his work hours positively of negatively. His work hours is the same despite the increase in hourly wage.
The effect of the Anthony sticking to 40 hours of work despite an increase in wage, which could have served as some motivation for him to put in more hours is his labor curve remains same. An increase in wage has done noting to affect the number of hours he works and as such his income vs work rate counters each other.
Cheers.
Answer:
$240,500
Explanation:
We know that
Current ratio = Total Current assets ÷ total current liabilities
= $2,141,000 ÷ $842,000
= 2.5 times
For current ratio falling below 2.2, we have to assume the borrowed amount be X
So, the equation would be
$2,141,000+ X ÷ $842,000 + X = 2.2
$2,141,000+ X = 2.2 × ($842,000 + X)
$2,141,000+ X = $1,852,400 + 2.2X
$2,141,000 - $1,852,400 = 2.2X - X
$288,600 = 1.2X
So X would be $240,500
Tax multiplier = -1.5
Tax increase = $200 billion
Therefore, since the multiplier is a negative value, the GDP must have gone down.
GDP = Tax increase/Tax multiplier = 200/-1.5 = $133.33 billion decrease.
Then, the correct answer is c.
