An opponent of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution would argue that it was unconstitutional because it gave too much power to the

History

2 answers:

Morgarella [4.7K]2 years ago

5 0

B) executive branch

photoshop1234 [79]2 years ago

5 0

Answer: B) executive branch

Explanation: Because the legislation gave too much power to the executive branch, many argued that the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution of 1964 was unconstitutional. In this resolution Congress authorized the president to deploy the United States military without a formal declaration of war.

You might be interested in

How did some people react to the scandal?

Aleonysh [2.5K]

<span>some people wanted to keep there land claims</span>

7 0

2 years ago

Which of the following best explains why the Stamp Act of 1765 was significant?

leonid [27]

The answer you're probably looking for is: The Stamp Act of 1765 was significant in the sense that it was the first direct tax imposed on American colonists (So, $Option A$ would most likely be the answer that you're looking for to this question, that you have asked

$Good\\Luck\\ on\\ your \\ assignment!$

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Place these events in the order in which they occurred,

Xelga [282]

Answer:

Explanation: 1) Stalin became the dictator of the USSR.-late 1920's

2) Khrushchev became the general Secretary - September 1953

3) De-Stalinization began- 1953 after Khrushchev achieved power

3) Sputnik was launched- May 1957

4 Yuri Gagarin became the first man in space-April 12, 1961

4 0