Answer: disequilibrium.
Explanation:
The concept of cognitive disequilibrium is part of Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development and describes a situation of cognitive imbalance when we find information that challenges us to generate a new schema or revise the existing one. In this example, Peggy experiences cognitive disequilibrium because she realises that the way she deals with dogs is not suitable to deal with students.
Answer:
Private company
Explanation:
A private company is a firm held under private ownership. Private companies may issue stock and have shareholders, but their shares do not trade on public exchanges and are not issued through an initial public offering (IPO). As a result, private firms do not need to meet the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) strict filing requirements for public companies.
The answer is <u>"relatively stable internal environment".</u>
Homeostasis is a key idea in seeing how our body functions. It implies keeping things steady and originates from two Greek words: 'homeo,' signifying 'similar,' and 'stasis,' signifying 'stable.' A more formal meaning of homeostasis is a normal for a framework that controls its inside condition and has a tendency to keep up a stable, moderately consistent, state of properties.
Homeostasis is going on always in our bodies. We eat, sweat, drink, move, eat some more, have salty fries, but then our body organization remains nearly the same.
Muslims invaded North Africa and occupied those territories and imposed jizya on the people. After a while the Non-Muslims were sick of being oppressed by the invaders and decided to become Muslims so that the burden of an extra tax would be removed.
Answer: B)only if transactions costs preclude bargaining between polluter and victim.
Explanation: Negative externalities is defined as the cost situation that arises due to the economic transaction. In this situation usually the third party(organization, owner of the property , any person) gets effected indirectly.
The government takes any step or interferes in this situation if the transaction cost is effecting the victim.The case can also lead to no settlement or bargaining between the the polluter(e.g.-company) and the victim(e.g.- public),thus.government takes action to resolve the matter.
Other options are incorrect because government interruption is required many disputes related with victim and environment. Government can invoke bargaining or settlement but cannot make it successful , it can be carried out by victim and polluter only. If the transact cost is high and unreasonable for the victim ,then usually government takes action.Thus, the correct option is option(B) .
