The appropriate response is Taoism. The underlying foundations of Taoism backpedal in any event to the fourth century BCE. Early Taoism drew its cosmological thoughts from the School of Yinyang, and was profoundly affected by one of the most seasoned writings of Chinese culture, the Yijing, which elucidates a philosophical framework about how to keep human conduct as per the rotating cycles of nature.
The model of what a Legislator SHOULDN'T look like was taken from the founding fathers' knowledge of the abuses of the British Parliament.
<span> The British Parliament used methods like passing Ex Post Facto laws, Bills of Attainder, and the "Corruption of the Blood" in treason as a means of silencing opposition. </span>
I don't know what your options are, but some differences were that:
The North was more urban and the South was rural.
The North had more European Immigrants
The North did not have slavery
The North had a better transportation
The North had a better education, and more engineers.
Answer:
(B) "but for" test
Explanation:
The but-for test is a test commonly used in both tort law and criminal law to determine actual causation. The test asks, "but for the existence of P, would Q have occurred?" If the answer is yes, then factor P is an actual cause of result Q.
