That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
<span>Mediterranean economies were short of gold but could supply salt, taken by places like the African salt mine of Taghaza</span><span>, whereas West African countries like Wangara </span><span>had plenty of gold but needed salt.</span>
Answer:
GOD CITY because only god was able to walk on water but he created a city he called it GOD CITY and that city was on the river
Explanation:
