Answer:
Compounding formula would be used here which is as under:
Future Value = Present value * (1+r)^n
FV = (PV is $2000) * ( 1 + 4%)^ 3 number of years
Remember that r is the return that is 4% that Sarah Jones will receive.
So
FV = $2250
So this is the amount that she will receive after three years. I would recommend her to invest in ordinary shares (take higher risk for higher return) so that she is able to buy a better car.
Correct question:
Correcting a market with an externality through taxation is _________ correcting it through a set output target from command and control.
Group of answer choices
A. less efficient than
B. as efficient as
C. either more or less depending on the elasticity of demand
D. more efficient than
Answer:
Correcting a market with an externality through taxation is (A) less effective than correcting it through a set output target from command and control.
<h3>Correcting a market with taxation:</h3>
- The government can discourage the consumption of harmful products by raising taxes on them.
- Cigarette and alcohol taxes, for example, are raised on a regular basis to discourage their consumption and limit their adverse impacts on unconnected third parties.
<h3>Command and control strategies:</h3>
- Command and control is a sort of environmental regulation that allows policymakers to expressly regulate both the amount and the procedure by which a company should maintain environmental quality.
- Correcting marketing is more effective than correcting manufacturing through taxation.
<h3>Reason -</h3>
As it is stated above Correcting marketing is more effective than correcting manufacturing through taxation.
Therefore, Correcting a market with an externality through taxation is (A) less effective than correcting it through a set output target from command and control.
Know more about market correction here:
brainly.com/question/2626419
#SPJ4
Maturity Value = Principal x ( 1 + Rate x Time )
Here is:
Principal = $90,000
Rate = 6% = .06
Time = 120 / 360
Maturity value = $90,000 x ( 1 + .06 x 120/360 ) =
= $90,000 x ( 1 + .02 ) =
= $90,000 x 1.02 = $91,800
Answer: c. $91,800
Answer:
Consumers should not buy from companies that don't source materials
Explanation:
Companies should never have an excuse for not sourcing for their materials responsively and responsibly. They owe an ethical responsibility as well as a duty to offer their customers qualitative products at the best price and that is most sustainable to the environment.In recent times, through the widespread use of social media and the instrument of investigative journalism, it has been able to bring to the surface, the less than responsible activities of many companies in sourcing for their interest of the public and the environment.The 2006 movie "Blood Diamond" shows an avid description of how diamonds are mined and traded in the war-torn country of Sierra Leonne depicting the violation of Human and Child rights and how is excessively enriched diamond suppliers and companies.It is clear that many companies despite the public outcry for transparency in revealing their supply chain in sourcing for their materials still chose unorthodox practices. It therefore, falls on the consumers to spend their money responsibly and make smart and credible choices with their finances by refusing to buy from companies that are not transparent with their source materials.Consumers are the life-wire of any business and the hope of any business survival rests majorly on consumer satisfaction. Researches have shown that companies are no being accountable with the natural resources are utilized and have been used to cause serious harm to people and the environment. Since the companies manage to evade adequate regulations and responsibilities, it falls on the consumers to ensure that their money serves them to the greatest value.
