Answer:
Explanation:
1) The total cost of reducing runoff if the farmers are not allowed to trade permits is:
total loss = farmer A' loss + farmer B's loss
where:
- farmer A's loss = (100 - 50) x $25 = $1,250
- farmer B's loss = (100 - 50) x $50 = $2,500
total loss = $1,250 + $2,500 = $3,750
2) The total cost of reducing runoff if the farmers are allowed to trade permits is:
Since farmer A will be willing to sell his permits to farmer B for a price that is ≥ $25 and ≤ $50, the total cost of reducing runoff is $2,500.
If farmer A sells his runoff permit at a price higher than $25 his costs will decrease but farmer B's costs will increase, so any gain due to price change is offset by the other farmer's loss.
Answer:
The correct answer is straight rebuy.
Explanation:
The straight buyback is a routine, low participation purchase. A minimum of information is needed and consideration of alternatives is not necessary. This type of purchase is handled by the purchasing department and is usually acquired from a list of approved suppliers. Examples of straight repurchase are repeating purchases of office supplies, and small parts.
The correct option is b. the firm's total cost $500.
Total cost:
Total fixed costs are the total of all recurring, fixed costs that a business incurs.
The variable and fixed expenses of providing commodities are combined to create a total using the total cost formula. The equation is:
Total cost = (Average fixed cost x average variable cost) × Number of units produced.
Cindy's Car Wash has average variable costs of $
and average fixed costs of 
when it produces 
units of output (car washes).
The firm's total cost is
AFC = $
, AVC = $
Average total cost = AFC + AVC = $
It produces units
$ × = $
Therefore, option b is the answer $.
Learn more about total cost here brainly.com/question/25369053
#SPJ4
Answer:
$90,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what Jamie’s at-risk limitation on losses is:
Using this formula
Risk limitation on losses=[Partnership M +(General partnership interest× Recourse debt agreement)]
Let plug in the formula
Risk limitation on losses= [$40,000 + (50% × $100,000)]
Risk limitation on losses=($40,000+$50,000)
Risk limitation on losses=$90,000
Therefore Jamie’s at-risk limitation on losses is:$90,000 and the reason why Jamie’s at-risk limitation on losses was the amount of $90,000 was because of his share of the recourse debt of the amount of $100,000 as well as the cash amount of $40,000 he invested.
Answer:
You will end up with 1% or 100 basis points + LIBOR floating rated loan
Explanation:
You will have to pay interest on loan at a fixed rate of -5%
transaction with the Swap dealer
you will have to pay dealer LIBOR that is -LIBOR
(Payment is to be outflow so the negative sign is used)
Dealer will pay and you will receive fixed +4%
Net interest = -5%-LIBOR+4%
-1%- LIBOR
So the Net effect is that you will end up with 1% or 100 basis points + LIBOR floating rated loan
