All categories

3 years ago

For planning control, and decision-making purpose:

Business

1 answer:

dolphi86 [110]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

D) mixed costs should be separated into their variable and fixed components

Explanation:

A mixed cost is a cost that contains both a fixed cost component and a variable cost component. It is important to understand the mix of these elements of a cost, so that one can predict how costs will change with different levels of activity. Typically, a portion of a mixed cost may be present in the absence of all activity, in addition to which the cost may also increase as activity levels increase. As the level of usage of a mixed cost item increases, the fixed component of the cost will not change, while the variable cost component will increase. The formula for this relationship is

You might be interested in

What is the relationship between financial system and economy

pentagon [3]

Answer:

Financial markets help to efficiently direct the flow of savings and investment in the economy in ways that facilitate the accumulation of capital and the production of goods and services.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

MC Qu. 169 A manufacturer reports the following costs to produce... A manufacturer reports the following costs to produce 23,000

Firdavs [7]

Answer:

Unitary product cost= $54

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Production= 23,000 units

Direct materials= $23 per unit

Direct labor= $19 per unit

Variable overhead= $276,000

<u>Under the variable costing method, the unit product cost is calculated using direct material, direct labor, and variable overhead.</u>

First, we need to calculate the unitary variable overhead.

Unitary overhead= 276,000/23,000= $12 per unit

Unitary product cost= 23 + 19 + 12= $54

5 0

3 years ago

JohnBoy Industries has a cash balance of $54,000, accounts payable of $134,000, inventory of $184,000, accounts receivable of $2

Anettt [7]

Answer:Net working capital = $152,500

Explanation:

Net working capital = CA– CL

Where CA= Current Assets = Cash + Inventory + Accounts Receivable

and CL= Current Liabilities= Account payable + Notes payable + accrued wages and taxes

CA=$54, 000 + $184,000 + $ 219,000 =$457,000

Current liabilities = Account payable + Notes payable + accrued wages and taxes

CL = $134,000 + $129,000 + $41,500 = $304,500

Net working capital = Current assets – Current liabilities

Net working capital = $457,000 – $304,500= $152,500

Net working capital = $152,500

5 0

3 years ago

1. Stock A has an expected return of 7%, a standard deviation of expected returns of 35%, a correlation coefficient with the mar

posledela

Answer:

Option A is riskier

Explanation:

In this question, we want to know which of the two stocks is riskier.

To answer this, we can use the standard deviation of returns as a risk measure.

For a security with a big value for standard deviation of returns, its per period returns are wider making its range per day large.

Hence, what this means is that out of the two stocks, the one with a larger value of standard deviation of returns will guarantee more risk as it is expected to give a better ranges of price

Now back to the values in the question, we can see that the standard deviation of returns of stock A is greater than that of stock B which this makes it a more risky option

4 0

3 years ago

Elizabeth Kennedy sells beauty supplies. Her annual demand for a particular skin sparkle is 17,000 units. The cost of placing an

elena-s [515]

Answer:

The minimum cost will be "$214085".

Explanation:

$D = 1700 units \\\\S = \$ 50 \\\\H= 20%\\$

i) When quantity = 1-1500, price = $ 12.50 , and holding price is $12.50 * 20 %= $2.50.

ii) When quantity = 1501 -10,000, price = $ 12.45 , and holding price is $12.45 * 20 %= $2.49.

iii) When quantity = 10,0001- and more, price = $ 12.40 , and holding price is $12.40 * 20 %= $2.48.

$EOQ= \sqrt{\frac{2DS}{H}} \\\\EOQ1= \sqrt{\frac{2\times 17000\times 50}{2.50}} \\\\EOQ1=824.62 \ \ \ or \ \ \ 825\\$

$EOQ2= \sqrt{\frac{2\times 17000\times 50}{2.49}} \\\\EOQ1=826.2T \ \ \ or \ \ \ 826\\$

$EOQ3= \sqrt{\frac{2\times 17000\times 50}{2.48}} \\\\EOQ3=827.93 \ \ \ or \ \ \ 828\\$

know we should calculate the total cost of EOQ1 and break ever points (1501 to 10,000)units

$total \ cost = odering \ cost + holding \ cost + \ Annual \ product \ cost\\\\total_c = \frac{D}{Q} \times S + \frac{Q}{2} \times H + (p \times D) \\\\T_c = \frac{17000}{825} \times 50+ \frac{825}{2} \times 2.50 + (12.50 \times 17000)\\\\T_c = 1030 .30 +1031.25+212500\\\\T_c =$ 214561.55\\\\$

$T_c = \frac{17000}{1501} \times 50+ \frac{1501}{2} \times 2.49 + (12.45 \times 17000)\\\\T_c = 566.28 +1868.74+211650\\\\T_c =$ 214085.02 \ \ \ or \ \ \ $ 214085\\\\$

$T_c = \frac{17000}{10001} \times 50+ \frac{10001}{2} \times 2.48 + (12.40 \times 17000)\\\\T_c = 84.99+ 12401.24+210800\\\\T_c =$ 223286.23 \\$

The total cost is less then 15001. So, optimal order quantity is 1501, that's why cost is = $214085.

5 0

3 years ago