Answer:
Option (b) is correct.
Explanation:
In 2010,
Real GDP = 600,000
Population = 5,000
Real GDP per person:
= Real GDP ÷ Population
= 600,000 ÷ 5,000
= 120
In 2011,
Real GDP = 636,480
Population = 5,200
Real GDP per person:
= Real GDP ÷ Population
= 636,480 ÷ 5,200
= 122.4
Growth rate of real GDP per person during the year 2011:
= [(Real GDP per person in 2011 - Real GDP per person in 2010) ÷ Real GDP per person in 2010] × 100
= [(122.4 - 120) ÷ 120] × 100
= (2.4 ÷ 120) × 100
= 0.02 × 100
= 2%
It was seen from the data available on the world bank that the United states real GDP per person is growing at an average rate of 2% between 1910 and 2010.
Hence, the Growth rate of real GDP per person during the year 2011 is about the same as average U.S. growth over the last one-hundred years.
<span>It depends on their agreement. It could be a general partnership or a limited partnership. One could be an investor and one runs the business day to day.</span>
Answer:
D. Make Plain which creates $6 more profit per machine hour than Fancy does
Explanation:
Brooks Corporation can sell all the units it can produce of either Plain or Fancy but not both. Plain has a unit contribution margin of $72 and takes two machine hours to make and Fancy has a unit contribution margin of $90 and takes three machine hours to make. There are 2,400 machine hours available to manufacture a product.
Brooks should make Plain which creates $6 more profit per machine hour than Fancy does.
Answer:
The correct option is;
Workers
Explanation:
The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects or the “Common Rule” was published in 1991
Under the Health and Human Service regulations 45 CFR part 46 (the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects or "Common Rule" published in 1991) the principles of ethical research involving human subjects, care should be taken with regards to the specific requirements of vulnerable populations such as children, pregnant women, prisoners, mentally disabled persons, economically disadvantaged or educationally disadvantaged persons.
True-No conflict will exist between the NPV and IRR methods, when used to evaluate two equally risky but mutually exclusive projects, if the projects' cost of capital exceeds the rate at which the projects' NPV profiles cross.
<h3>
What is NPV and IRR methods?</h3>
While the IRR approach calculates the projected percentage return, the NPV method produces the predicted dollar worth of a project.
Purpose. The breakeven cash flow level of a project is the emphasis of the IRR approach while project surpluses are the subject of the NPV method.
assistance with decisions. Since it provides a dollar return, the NPV approach delivers an outcome that serves as the basis for an investment decision. The IRR approach is not helpful in making this choice because its percentage return does not indicate to the investor how much money will be produced.
Reinvestment rate. When NPV is utilized, the firm's cost of capital is the assumed rate of return for reinvesting intermediate cash flows; when it is the internal rate of return.
To learn more about NPV and IRR methods from the given link:
brainly.com/question/21241533
#SPJ4
