Answer:
$6,237
Explanation:
The computation of the cash required for the payment is shown below:
= Merchandise amount - return and allowances - discount
= $7,500 - $1,200 - $63
= $6,237
The discount = (Merchandise amount - return and allowances) × discount rate
= ($7,500 - $1,200) × 1%
= $63
Simply we consider the items i.e merchandise purchase amount, returned merchandise amount and the discount given amount
Answer:
$91,100
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the total cost of merchandise purchased
Using this formula
Total cost of merchandise purchased = Invoice cost of merchandise purchases + Cost of transportation in - Purchase returns and allowances - Purchase discount
Let plug in the formula
Total cost of merchandise purchased= $100,000 + $500 - $400 - $9,000
Total cost of merchandise purchased= $91,100
Therefore the total cost of merchandise purchased is $91,100
Answer:
C) formed a valid contract because Rachel's outward expressions showed the formation of a contract.
Explanation:
A valid contract is a binding and enforceable agreement, where all parties are legally bound to perform the contract.
Probably the most important part of a contract is the existence of an offer and acceptance. Once a valid offer is accepted, it binds the parties into a valid contract.
In this case, Rachel accepted Julius´s offer to buy her boat, so an offer and acceptance exists.
Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
