Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
The native Americans who lived there drove them out of their land or they never knew that South Carolina existed(I’m probably wrong try googling it.)
Boliviar had hoped for a unified state in latin america, but instead latin america was divided into Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela
Treaty of Tordesillas had a lot to do in the division of Latin America. Back then, the majority of Latin countries were controlled by Portugal and Spain. In order to make colonization became easier, they divided Latin America into several parts
hope this helps
The classic seven wonders were:<span>Great Pyramid of Giza.Hanging Gardens of Babylon.Statue of Zeus at Olympia.Temple of Artemis at Ephesus.Mausoleum at Halicarnassus.Colossus of Rhodes.<span>Lighthouse of Alexandria.</span></span>
