4/10 is equal to 2/5 because if you reduce 4/10 you get 2/5 which shows that they are equal.
Sure. From those choices, the only one that makes sense is that he
didn't perform enough trials. Technically, you can't expect the experimental
probability to match the theoretical probability until you've rolled it an infinite
number of times.
I have a hunch that even for only 60 trials, such a great discrepancy between
theory and experiment is beginning to suggest that the cubie is loaded. But
you really can't say. You just have to keep trying and watch how the numbers
add up.
B. Y-y1=m(X-X1)
Y--1= 2(X-2)
Y+1= 2x-4
Sub 1
Y= 2x-5
The m is 2 cuz it's parallel to the other equation
Answer: A vertical stretch of 4 and a translation of -2 units in the x-direction.
Step-by-step explanation:
Changes of the parent function can be written, in this case as <em>a</em>f(x)(x - <em>k</em>) where <em>a</em> is the stretch factor and <em>k</em> is the movement left or right on the x-axis.
In this case, a = 4 and k = 2. Since the k is negative, the function will be moved -2 units on the x-axis.
<em>Learn more about </em><em>transformations of a parent function</em><em> here:</em>
<em>brainly.com/question/13822715</em>