The answer is "facial feedback" effect.
The <span>facial feedback effect theory explains that when someone imitates some facial expressions it actually affect his or her emotional response, for example if during an even one person who is not enjoying the event is forced to smile and laugh, eventually he will find the even more joyful and might start enjoying the event.</span>
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Yes, people were upset by such a high tax on many goods that they threw a lot of tea over board.
All things to prevent the slaves/ African Americans from voting. Yet they still have the “option” to vote.