In <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
<h3>What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?</h3>
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.
The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.
Thus, in <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at brainly.com/question/7802791
#SPJ1
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Because the colonists of the thirteen colonies expressed dissatisfaction with the new taxes imposed by the English metropolis on the colony and attacked an English ship loaded with tea and threw the tea into the sea, with that England closed the port of boston and instituted the intolerable laws
Answer:
true
Explanation:
my teacher does lots of boring stories about Virginia
Answer:
Explanation:
Horror
The Shining (1980) Amazon iTunes.
The Fog (1980)
Umm i don't know if these are good or have bad things in them I never watched them soo I hoped this helped and good luck on you project
