Answer:
$16.66
Explanation:
Data provided
Direct material = $55,870
Direct labor hour = 475
Wage rate = $11
Machine hour = $556
Number of units = 4,100
Overhead rate = $13
The preparation of job sheet is shown below:-
Direct Material $55,870
Add: Direct Labor $5,225
( 475 × $11)
Overhead $7,228
($556 × $13)
Total $68,323
Number of units 4,100
Cost per unit $16.66
($68,323 ÷ 4,100)
Answer:
it can still gain from international trade in that commodity, by getting it at a lower opportunity cost than if it produced it domestically.
Explanation:
A country has comparative disadvantage in production if it produces at a higher opportunity cost when compared to other countries.
The country with a comparative disadvantage can gain from trade by trading the good with a country that has comparative advantage in the production of that good. i.e. the country produces at a lower opportunity cost
For example, country A produces 10kg of beans and 5kg of rice. Country B produces 5kg of beans and 10kg of rice.
for country A,
opportunity cost of producing beans = 5/10 = 0.5
opportunity cost of producing rice = 10/5 = 2
for country B,
opportunity cost of producing rice = 5/10 = 0.5
opportunity cost of producing beans = 10/5 = 2
Country B has a comparative disadvantage in the production of beans and country A has a comparative disadvantage in the production of rice
Country B should buy beans from A and A should buy rice from B
Answer:
$143
Explanation:
The computation of the demand forecast is shown below:
= Weightage × demand observed + Weightage × demand observed + Weightage × demand observed
= 0.1 × 120 + 0.4 × 140 + 0.5 × 150
= $12 + $56 + $75
= $143
Basically we multiplied the weighatge with its demand observed so that the demand forecast could come
Answer:
As in her worthless note,Sandy has a zero adjusted basis. Her bad debt deduction is Nil according to Section 166 (b).
Section 166(g)(1) states that her capital loss realized on the deemed sale of this stoke is also nil because of zero adjusted basis in her worthless stock.
According to Reg. Sec.1.1366-2(a)(5) if all of her stock is disposed by an S corporation shareholder and loss carryforward attributable to the Section 1366 (d) basis. Limitaitons are permanently disaalowed.
Hence, her $7,400 ordinary loss carryforward can never be deducted by Sandy.
Sandy has no 2012 tax consequences from worthlessness of her Lindlee investments
