Answer:
$19.47
Explanation:
The computation of the price paid for share is shown below:
= Year second dividend ÷ (Required rate of return - growth rate)
where,
Next year dividend is
= $2.20 + $2.20 × 2.2%
= $2.20 + $0.0484
= $2.2484
In the year 2 , it is
= $2.2484 × 1.022
= $2.2978648
And, the required rate of return is 14%
Plus the growth rate is 2.2%
So, the price paid for the share is
= ( $2.2978648) ÷ (14% - 2.2%)
= $19.47
The answer is: C. focus differentiation strategy
Focus differentiation strategy refers to the strategy made to make the products of certain business become distinguishable from other products on similar market. To highlight the difference, focus differentiation stratefy would mentioned specific details about the product or advantages that the product have over other competitors.
Answer:
the three options are valid:
- Most consumers would prefer to buy products made by a company that demonstrates ethical behavior.
- Research has shown a correlation between organizations' commitment to ethics and profitability.
- Employees prefer to work for highly ethical organizations.
Explanation:
According to Accenture Strategy’s Global Consumer Pulse Research, the vast majority of consumers care about corporate actions and ethics, i.e. what the corporation says it does compared to what it really does. Also, the vast majority of consumers prefer to purchase products from ethical corporations. This is true not only because a research study says so, it is something logical.
Several researches have shown that higher corporate social responsibility results in higher profits. Basically the reasons for this correlation are the same ones as the previous statement's.
Employees, specially younger ones (40 years old and less) tend to be very concerned about working for ethical organizations and many are committed to improving ethical standards.
Information flows freely nowadays, and things that corporations could "hide" in the past, are made seen by millions in just a few minutes. Corporations aren't becoming ethical and green because they want to, they are doing so because consumers demand it.
Restrictive covenants "were rendered unenforceable by Shelly v. Kraemer in 1948."
This is evident by the Supreme Court decision in 1948 during the case of Shelly v. Kramer when the court ruled that the 14th Amendment prohibits the court from enforcing race discrimination in real estate contracts.
The 14th Amendment, which was ratified on July 9, 1868, stated that all the citizens of the United States have equal protection under the law.
Thus, no American citizens shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property by any state law.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A. "were rendered unenforceable by Shelly v. Kraemer in 1948."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/21345607
