Summary and Definition of Nativism in America
Summary and Definition: Nativism in America refers to the preference for established US residents, as opposed to foreigners or "others" considered to be outsiders and the opposition to immigration. The belief in Nativism was a prejudicial attitude towards immigrants based on their national origin, their ethnic background, their race or religion. The doctrine of Nativism in America resulted in a widespread attitude that rejected alien persons, or culture, and led to xenophobia and new, stringent laws being passed to restrict immigration.
Answer:
B> - If the ruling dynasty was fair, it would keep the Mandate of Heaven.
Explanation:
The Mandate of Heaven was a belief in the establishment of a ruler from the qualities of a person. Under this Mandate, there is no specific rule that determines who can or cannot become the ruler. Rather, a person's qualities, such as being fair, just, how well he can rule, or how 'good' he is in terms of his behavior and qualities.
The belief that such a ruler is determined from the internal qualities comes from the idea of the ruler being the "son of heaven". In other words, such type of person is good, just, kind, fair, and does not indulge in immoral or bad activities, which makes him ideal for a leader. Moreover, he will also be accepted by the gods, which is a huge factor.
So, <u>if a ruling dynasty or a ruler is fair, he can keep the Mandate of Heaven</u> but if not, then the Mandate cannot be his.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
<u>Answer:</u>
There was a rise in Nativism because the people were afraid that the communism would spread.
<u>Explanation:</u>
"Nativism” is a political party which promotes interests of its native residents and not of the immigrants.
Immigration reached its new heights by the end of 19th century in US. There were diverse cultures, new languages and customs and racial enmity.
In reaction to all this, many supported Nativism. Nativists also fueled a sense of fear by supposing that there was a foreign threat. They pointed the assassinations of the “Spanish prime minister” in 1897, the “Italian” king in 1900, and even President "William McKinley" in 1901 as evidence of all this.
The south because they relied on trade
