The massive inequalities of second-wave (classical) civilizations was accepted because of the philosophical religious systems. These systems, which included <u>Greek rationalism, Hindu faith, and Confucian philosophy</u>, supported inequality.
In China, Confucianism was used to <u>justify the class system and patriarchy.</u> Also, Aristotle developed the notion that some people were <u>"slaves by nature"</u> and should be enslaved for their own good and for that of the larger society.
Finally, the social inequity was both accepted and resisted in classical civilizations. Some evidence supporting this statement is the fact that people who disagree with Confucianism fought back with <u>Daoism</u> and the fact that strong states like China served to <u>strengthen social inequality</u>.
When a <span>historian compares transcripts of speeches delivered by powerful leaders throughout world history, these would serve as "primary source documents," since they provide and "unaltered" insight into the past. </span>
The economic costs to the Indian people as a result of India being ruled by the British include the inability to control their markets especially in regards to prices of exports and wages paid to workers. Other losses include the loss of revenue from taxes and tariffs that instead went to the British Government. There were also a number of other losses that were incurred as a result of colonialism in India.
Answer:
the reason I ask is that you are not even going to be a little late to the party but I will be there in a few minutes and I will be there in a few minutes and I will
Answer:
Can you ask in English please
Explanation:
