Each group valued Minnesota's natural resources such as land and rivers for a different purpose. The Dakota used natural resources as a source of livelihood.
European Americans, on the other hand, aimed to use Minnesota's natural resources as a way to establish properties on the fertile frontier.
Therefore, the Dakota Indian group had a deep connection to the land of Minnesota, using its resources to support its community through fishing and hunting.
European American settlers, on the other hand, were interested in transforming the land into a state with the implementation of trade and property to generate wealth.
The Dakota were then threatened and forced to cede their Minnesota lands by signing treaties in 1851.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/16052322
Answer:
Write in English so a lot of people can understand you and help you
Even though im not writing the 2 paragraphs let me give you info about one of the cases: <span>Gibbons vs. Ogden: Federally issued permit vs. State (NY) issued permit to navigate waterways around New York. Marshall court re-emphasized Article VI (Supremacy) stating that federal law trumps state and this decision further emphasized the Commerce Clause stating that commerce was not defined solely as the buying and selling of goods, but the transportation thereof as well. Establishing that only the national Congress had the ability to regulate interstate trade, further strengthening the federal government over the states. This case as many affect the nature of federalism regarding its power, rights and roles. </span>
Ussr declared a blonde of allied sectors and West Berlin in June 1948 the Berlin blockade the cut
Pretty sure it’s C because it doesn’t have to do with trading slaves
