Obviously, there is 784/7, but there is a less common kind of expression that also works. Since a fraction is similar to a division expression, you can flip 7 to make 1/7. The other expression could be 1/7 x 784.
So the two expressions could be 784/7 and 1/7 x 784
---
hope it helps
8 apples. because 2/5 is 8/20 apples, that is why. :)
The commutative property implies that, the order of multiplication is not important.
is true
Commutative property of multiplication states that:
If 
The expression is given as:

To get the commutative expression, we simply change the position of each factor in the expression.
So, some possible equivalent expressions are:



There are several other equivalent expressions.
From the list of options;
is true
Read more about commutative property at:
brainly.com/question/7037119
I believe it would be true because you can have the first set then when you have your second set it just have to be slanted for them to all be acute & obtuse angles