You would make common denominators for all of the weights. The denominator is the bottom half of a fraction. The denominators are 2, 4 and 8. The common denominator of these numbers is 8. This is because 2 times 4 is 8 and 4 times 2 is 8. Now, because you multiplied the denominator of 2 by 4, you would multiply the numerator by 4. 1 times 4 is 4. So, the first number would 2 4/8. After that you would multiply 3/8 times 2. The answer to that would be 6/8. The next number is 1 1/4. Multiply the numerator and denominator by 2, getting 1 and 2/8. Now add 2 4/8, 6/8 and 1 2/8 together. The answer is 3 and 12/8. This can also be written as 4 and 4/12, which can also be written as 4 and 1/3.
The answer is 4 and 1/3 pounds.
Isolate the x. Add 1/6 to both sides
x - 1/6 (+1/6) = 8 (+1/6)
x = 8 1/6
hope this helps
Answer:
it has a 1% chance.
Step-by-step explanation:
Because of the whole there is one chip in it that has a 2 on it so it has a 1% chance out of 100%
This is probably a question about comparing the specific operations being performed in the pairs of functions provided. In all cases but D, the rate of growth converges at extremes of x. Tbh it could probably be worded better...
In A, the degree of both expressions is the same: 2. The biggest thing being done to x that it's squared, and the fact that one expression has an extra x term doesn't change it's rate of growth significantly because at high values of x, the functions will essentially be the same (e.g. compare 1000^2+4(1000) and 1000^2 - the difference is quite small and only gets smaller as you go up)
In B, again the same operation is being performed (taking the natural logarithm of x). The second expression can also be written as 2lnx, making it quite similar to the first (but with a vertical stretch by a factor of 2).
Same idea again for C - same operation (e^x) and same order of operation being performed.
For D, x^3 and x^4 are different functions completely. As you increase x, the functions begin to diverge from one another more and more. This reflects significantly different rates of growth.
Answer: I haven’t done this in a bit, but I think this is right.
Step-by-step explanation:
