Answer:
d) all of these: nominated by the president, confirmed by the U.S. Senate, and appointed for an indefinite period providing they maintain "good behavior."
Explanation:
Federal judges, who are the ones that are that preside over the Supreme Court proceedings and evaluate laws, are indeed nominated by the President, by the U.S. Senate, and appointed for an indefinite period providing they maintain "good behavior" or until they decide to retain, as Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution provides:
<em>he (The President) </em><em>shall nominate</em><em>, and by and </em><em>with the advice and consent of the Senate</em><em>, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, </em><em>judges</em><em> of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States.</em>
And as Article III, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution states:
<em>The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior</em>
With this latter provision, the Constitution guarantees that judges make decisions and evaluate statutes according to what is right under the law, and not according to popular's opinion or political pressure. This way, judges don’t have to fear that they will be fired if they make an unpopular decision.
Answer:
The Boston Massacre was a deadly riot that occurred on March 5, 1770, on King Street in Boston. It began as a street brawl between American colonists and a lone British soldier, but quickly escalated to a chaotic, bloody slaughter.
Explanation:
Answer:
Internal; hard work
Explanation:
Locus of control refers to the degree to which people believe that they have control over their own lives. A locus of control is characterized as internal if the person believes that they can control their own life or external if they believe that life is controlled by outside factors which they cannot influence. In this example, college students with an internal locus of control did better academically, and were also more likely to associate their academic success with hard work.
President Johnson soon disappointed Radical Republicans by rejecting their concept that the federal government could provide freed slaves voting rights. The first debates between the president and the Radical Republicans on how to deal with the vanquished South laid the stage for future strife.
President Johnson was adamantly opposed. He vetoed the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, stating that it would increase government size. He vetoed the Civil Rights Act, claiming that blacks do not have the "same property and person rights" as whites. Johnson's racism outraged moderate Republicans.
Johnson's stated reasons for rejecting the law were identical to those cited by the measure's opponents in the House and Senate: extending the original act was unnecessary, and it infringed on states' rights.
To learn more about Radical Republicans
brainly.com/question/9885374
#SPJ4
1. alley
2. rattle
3. raggedy
4. invisible
