Read the following excerpt. What is wrong with the in-text citations?

English

1 answer:

Nataliya [291]3 years ago

6 0

The correct answer is A. Nothing, the in-text citation is correct.

Explanation

A quote is a way of referencing in a text of our authorship what someone else has said. Throughout history hundreds of forms have been developed to quote, however in recent years, these referencing systems have been developed more widely because universities and the scientific world have become more strict with this issue. One of the most accepted and easiest ways to quote is using last name, year, page, in parentheses for references to the author that we want to include in our text. According to the above, the quote from the fragment of the text of the question is correct because it uses the basic parameters mentioned above necessary for a quote (Hauptmann, 2008, p. 137). So, the correct answer is A. Nothing, the quote in the text is correct.

You might be interested in

PLEASE HELP BUT DONT COPY AND PASTE THE ANSWER FROM SAFARI ANYWAYS

natka813 [3]

Answer:In 1863, Congress designated the Idaho Territory with the erroneous understanding that Idaho was a Shoshone word meaning Gem of the Mountains. This has led the state to be nicknamed Gem of the Mountains, or most succinctly in more recent times, The Gem State.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

What is the third step in crafting an effective rebuttal

Ahat [919]

Answer:

I believe the answer would be B: Present evidence to support this reason and refute the counterclaim.

Explanation:

If you present your evidence to support your reason and then refute the counterclaim it will make a bigger impact on the reader.

8 0

3 years ago

Metaphors and Literal Meanings

8090 [49]

Are you asking for which ones are metaphors ??
If so...
The building was a maze
The sidewalk could fry an egg
Her eyes drilled into my face
The company is buried in work.
Those are all metaphors the others are literal

8 0

4 years ago

Why has Machiavelli’s The Prince evoked so much discussion and controversy? What do readers find enlightening, horrifying, or di

Hatshy [7]

"The prince" was the first book that didn't take politics as something ethical or philosophical. Machiavelli wrote it to Lorenzo di Medici as a "guide" to maintain his power. Ancient philosophers were focused on constucting the ideal state. That means, they mentioned the characteristics of a succesfull monarchy for example, but did not considered the things as they were at that moment. Readers find disturbing the tactics that Machiavelli describes to gain or maintain power as they include making people fear you or destroying your enemies. This book is always resumed with the phrase "The end justifies the means", making it clear that the rulers can do anything to maintain their power.

The controversy is understandable, this books shows how cruel can reality be and how politics scrifice ethics in the name of power. The discussion is still relevant nowadays. How far can politicians go to win an election?

7 0

3 years ago

MARKING BRAINLIEST IF YOU ANSWER THIS!

olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer:

dialogue is character conversations

Explanation:

Alice, is not repelled by wonderland, instead she is astounded by it.

this is supported by her dialogue throughout the story

i have not read the story myself so find two things in the story she says TO SOMEONE, not in her head as that would be inner dialogue

make sure the thing she says supports the idea that she likes wonderland

conversations with mad hatter for example.

6 0

3 years ago