1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vera_Pavlovna [14]
3 years ago
8

Why did the United States suffer a loss of confidence following the launch of Sputnik I?

History
2 answers:
lozanna [386]3 years ago
8 0
This was because it meant that the USSR had won the space race and it knocked the USA's confidence because the USSR was not as technologically advanced as them due to being communist and did not have many computers as the government mainly felt that it would allow the people to rebel against communism more easily. Therefore, the USA felt threatened by the USSR winning the space race because it meant that they could be catching up to their level in technological advances.
11111nata11111 [884]3 years ago
4 0
Is sputnik something russian?
You might be interested in
The land ordinance of 1785:
Mademuasel [1]
The Land Ordinance of 1785 was adopted by the United States Congress of the Confederation on May 20, 1785. It set up a standardized system whereby settlers could purchase title to farmland in the undeveloped west. ... The 1785 ordinance laid the foundations of land policy until passage of the Homestead Act in 1862.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Political science ❗️
nexus9112 [7]
Work was the easiest settlement was the hardest without paperwork
8 0
2 years ago
Need Your Help Please!! Need answer ASAP! Please
IRINA_888 [86]
The industrial revolution made the world a positive some world meaning that was more resources to go around. But most of the resources were produced by the top 1% meaning that the richer got richer and the poor get poor.
8 0
2 years ago
What was the significance of the treaty of versailles on germany from 1919-1939?
Svetach [21]
<span> The Treaty affected Germany in more than one way. It had an effect politically, economically, socially and diplomatically and much of the transformation of Germany between 1919 and 1939 can be attributed to consequences of the Treaty of Versailles.

</span>
<span>In accordance with article 231 of the treaty of Versailles, the Guilt clause, Germany acknowledged that they started World War one.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Where did the Romans get the money to build a new navy? What might this say about the strength of the Roman Republic?
Roman55 [17]

It took two men to wrestle Rome back from chaos and turn a republic into an empire. In the first century BC, Rome was a republic. Power lay in the hands of the Senate, elected by Roman citizens. But the senators were fighting for power between themselves.

'fleet') comprised the naval forces of the ancient Roman state. ... Because of that, the navy was never completely embraced by the Roman state, and deemed somewhat "un-Roman". In antiquity, navies and trading fleets did not have the logistical autonomy that modern ships and fleets possess.

Many of the achievements of the ancient Romans are still in use today. The Roman Empire was powerful, due to its strong military tactics. Roman military policies helped to expand the empire. The soldiers were trained in the latest tactics of war and were well equipped with the weapons of war.

Who were the top government officials in the Roman Republic and what were their duties? Consuls. There were 2 consuls and they headed the army and ran the government. They also kept each other in line because each could veto the other's decision.

It took two men to wrestle Rome back from chaos and turn a republic into an empire. In the first century BC, Rome was a republic. Power lay in the hands of the Senate, elected by Roman citizens. But the senators were fighting for power between themselves.

Invasions by Barbarian tribes. The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders.

'fleet') comprised the naval forces of the ancient Roman state. ... Because of that, the navy was never completely embraced by the Roman state, and deemed somewhat "un-Roman". In antiquity, navies and trading fleets did not have the logistical autonomy that modern ships and fleets possess.

hope this helps

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which country was NOT part of the allied powers during WWI
    15·2 answers
  • Discuss the events of the Boston Massacre and the verdict of the jury. What happened on the night of March 5, 1770? Are the sold
    14·1 answer
  • Which God was most important to the Incas? Why?
    7·2 answers
  • ILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIST !! *have to get it right * How did the issue of slavery affect affect politics in the United States?
    9·1 answer
  • Uwu help with these questions plz​
    8·2 answers
  • What is “Operation Iraqi Freedom?”
    7·1 answer
  • When a juvenile is caught committing a crime, he or she is taken into (blank) by the police
    12·1 answer
  • Lgbtq+ rights are immaculate <br> true or false?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is the term used to describe the philosophies and schools that flourished from 6th Century to 221 BCE dur
    6·1 answer
  • Select ALL the correct answers.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!