1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NemiM [27]
3 years ago
10

​In 2017, in proposing a $1 trillion increase in government spending on infrastructure, President Trump argued that the spending

would increase total employment in the United States
Source: Ted Mann and Michael C.​ Bender, "President Trump to Launch Push for Infrastructure​ Investment," Wall Street Journal​, June​ 4, 2017.

In the short​ run, increases in federal spending will increase real GDP and employment if:
A. the economy is producing at less than its potential output and has some cyclical unemployment.
B. wages and prices do not change.
C. the economy is experiencing inflation.
D. the price level remains stable.
Business
1 answer:
VLD [36.1K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A. the economy is producing at less than its potential output and has some cyclical unemployment.

Explanation:

Increase in government spending will increase domestic income, only if economy is producing at less than its potential output.

Increase in federal government spending raises the level of 'govt expenditure' in Aggregate Demand. This creates 'Excess Demand' (AD > AS). However, if the economy is at full employment level, i.e all the resources are already best efficiently utilised as per their production potential. Then, the economy can't increase its domestic income more than its full employment (full potential) level. So : Increase in government spending in full employment case, wont increase total production/ income/ employment further ; as the economy is already at full employment & can't increase economic activity beyond that.

You might be interested in
What did timothy do with the rope he made?
ss7ja [257]
Timothy stretched the rope between the hut and the beach for Philips to follow.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When you've carefully checked all the facts and your attitudes and still find that there's "just something" about your superviso
Nataly [62]
True you should always suspect it and try to fix it

6 0
3 years ago
Novak Corp. bought equipment on January 1, 2022. The equipment cost $390000 and had an expected salvage value of $35000. The lif
nirvana33 [79]

Answer:

$177,000

Explanation:

In order to find the book value of the equipment we need to find the amount of depreciation per year. To do this we need to subtract the salvage value from the initial cost and then simply divide by 5 which is the life span of the equipment...

(390,000 - 35,000) / 5 = x

355,000 / 5 = x

71,000 = x

Now we see that the equipment will depreciate by $71,000 per year. In three years the depreciation would be

71,000 * 3 = 213,000

Now we simply subtract this value from the initial cost to get the book value in the third year

390,000 - 213,000 = 177,000

7 0
3 years ago
cyber security systems had sales of 3,700 units at $75 per unit last year. the marketing projects of a 10 percent increase in un
jasenka [17]

Answer:

$393,162

Explanation:

Units sold last year were 3,700

the projection for this year is an increase of 10% in volume.

projected units sales for this year will be

=110% of 3,700

=1.1 x 3,700

=4,070 units

The selling price last year was $75.

projected price this year is an increase by 40%

price for this year will be 140% of $75

=140/100 x $75

=1.4 x $75

=$105

Projected sales in dollar will be sales volume x selling price

= 4070units x $105

=$427,350

Purchase return = 8% of projected sales in dollars

=8/100 x  $427,350

=34,188

Net projected sales

= $427,350 - $34,188

=$393,162

6 0
3 years ago
On June 16, 1995, the DJIA closed at $4,510.79. Assume the index lost 135 points on the next trading day. Compare that to a 500-
lora16 [44]

Answer:

The occurrence would be more impactful in 1995 as the % drop is higher

Explanation:

In 1995, % change in DJIA = 135 / 4510.79 = 0.029928 = 2.99%

Today, the DJIA is at 29,263.48 . The % change in DJIA = 500 / 29,263.48 = = 0.017086143 = 1.71% .

Thus, In 1995, the occurrence would be more impactful as the % drop is higher

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who focuses on project interdependencies and helps to determine the optimal approach for managing and realizing the desired bene
    12·1 answer
  • Taxes cause deadweight losses because they
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following might not be an option for increasing your present income? (1 point)requesting a promotion requesting a m
    11·1 answer
  • Windsor Company leased equipment from Costner Company, beginning on December 31, 2019. The lease term is 4 years and requires eq
    8·1 answer
  • Presented below is the trial balance of Pina Corporation at December 31, 2017. Debit CreditCash $ 198,550Sales $ 8,103,580Debt I
    9·1 answer
  • According to the Huff Gravity Model, the two factors which attract consumers to a store location are: travel time for customer t
    13·1 answer
  • As discussed in the lecture video, Crocs’ plastic molding and sandal design capabilities have provided the firm with only a temp
    7·1 answer
  • Microsoft is an example of a company using a(n) _____ strategy. The company produces the majority of its work in its U.S. headqu
    7·1 answer
  • The effects of legislation on human resource professionals is important because: Multiple choice question. it seldom changes and
    11·1 answer
  • The idea that firms will get the most for their money when they pay wages higher than the equilibrium wage is called:
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!