Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
The vertical line test, can be done with a pencil, and it's very simple. You run the object in a vertical position, horizontally across the graph, and if it hits two points on the same Y-Axis, your function is actually a relation, since functions are not allowed to have two coordinates on the same line.
24.5%<span> of the vehicles that passed that intersection are busses.</span>
<span>-I took 98/400 and got 0.245. To change a decimal to a percent, you multiply it by 100, so 0.245*100= 24.5%</span>
E=Z*sqrt (p(1-p)/N), where E= error margin, p=proportion, N=sample size
Katrina's margin error at 85% confidence interval: E=1.96*sqrt (p(1-p)/100) = 0.196 sqrt (1(1-p))
Mathew's margin error at 99% confidence interval: E= 2.58*sqrt (p(1-p)/400) = 0.129 sqrt (p(1-p))
Since both obtained same estimate of proportion (that is, value of p), it can be seen that Mathew's estimate will have a small error (That is, 0.129 is smaller than 0.196). This can be attributed to larger sample size although a wider confidence (99%) interval was considered.
3+ x/4=8
................
..
