1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
baherus [9]
3 years ago
10

Can someone help I have to do a sumary 8 lines long about the renaissance

History
1 answer:
Fantom [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Renaissance was a fervent period of European cultural, artistic, political and economic “rebirth” following the Middle Ages. Generally described as taking place from the 14th century to the 17th century, the Renaissance promoted the rediscovery of classical philosophy, literature and art. Some of the greatest thinkers, authors, statesmen, scientists and artists in human history thrived during this era, while global exploration opened up new lands and cultures to European commerce. The Renaissance is credited with bridging the gap between the Middle Ages and modern-day civilization.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did some Southerners support Republican Reforms?
MrRa [10]
After the end of the Civil war, the Republican party was left unchallenged in its authority over the country. It then started the process of Reconstruction of the South. This was faced by vehement opposition from the majority in the South that had supported the Confederate course. Those that supported these reforms were those that had been marginalized in the slavery system in the South. Others that supported the reforms projected to benefit from economic opportunities created by carpetbaggers looking to assert their authority in the south.  
4 0
3 years ago
Ap euro how did european imperial interests shift geographically in the nineteenth century
NISA [10]
If you think of European empire prior to the 19th century, where did they extend their control over other lands?  It was mostly in the Western hemisphere.  France and Spain and others had large colonial territories in the Americas.  During the years following the French Revolution in Europe (which happened at the end of the 18th century), Napoleon came to power and the Napoleonic wars were fought across Europe.  The focus of Napoleon's attention was on Europe, not on colonies across the ocean.  So, for instance, he sold off the Louisiana Purchase to the United States.  Elsewhere across the Americas, native populations took advantage of the changes in Europe to rebel against colonial governments.  Napoleon had taken control over Spain and other parts of Europe as well as France, and a wave of independence movements broke out in colonial territories in Central America and South America.

When Europe resumed efforts to extend its control over other parts of the world, later in the 19th century (and into the early 20th century), they shifted their focus to Africa and Asia.  There was a race for controlling territories across all of Africa and especially in southeast Asia.  In Africa, only Ethiopia and Liberia managed to maintain their independence from European control when that wave of imperialist action took place.
3 0
3 years ago
Which best describes the philippine-american war?
77julia77 [94]

The answer is option C:  this was a war seen by the Filipinos as a continuation of their independence while it was seen by the American government as an insurrection.

The armed conflict between The USA and the First Philippine Republic took place in 1899. It began when the latter refused to consent to the Treaty of Paris, in which the Kingdom of Spain renounced to the domain of the Philippines in favor of The United States.

For the Filipinos, the war extended from the military fight against the Kingdom of Spain that started in 1896, whereas the Americans considered it a refusal of obedience.

3 0
3 years ago
What was the result of the 1831 us supreme court case cherokee nation v. georgia​
eimsori [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) asked the Supreme Court to determine whether a state may impose its laws on Indigenous peoples and their territory. ... Instead, the Court ruled that it did not have jurisdiction over the case because the Cherokee Nation, was a “domestic dependent nation” instead of a “foreign state."

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the significance of the Battle of Stalingrad during World War II? 
Jet001 [13]

Hey there!!

The correct answer is C. It was the first large- scale in Soviet Victory.

Hope this helps and have a fantastic day! (:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did Roger Williams and Anne Hutchinson have in common?
    11·2 answers
  • Which is the best description of civil liberties?
    11·1 answer
  • What was Ralph Waldo Emerson's argument against the Mexican-American War?
    15·1 answer
  • Why is Thomas Jefferson considered an accomplished man, or a Renaissance man?
    7·1 answer
  • For what is the battle of antietam best known?
    8·1 answer
  • ANSWER!!!!!!!!!!!<br> 13 POINTS
    14·1 answer
  • What are some of the similarities between the Egyptian and Kush civilizations.
    9·1 answer
  • How did women influence politics in the 1920s?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is depicted here:
    7·1 answer
  • I just need 2 thru 5 asap!
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!