Answer: 56-35=21
Explanation:
5:8
10:16
15:24
20:32
25: 40
30: 48
35: 56
The last one there is a difference of 21
56-35=21
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
Answer:
Johnson believed the Southern states should decide the course that was best for them. He also felt that African-Americans were unable to manage their own lives. ... Johnson's vision of Reconstruction had proved remarkably lenient. Very few Confederate leaders were prosecuted.
Explanation:
The correct answer is A)Locke believed that people are naturally reasonable, while Hobbes believed that people are naturally selfish.
It is known that Thomas Hobbes tends to defend the absolutism and John Locke is a hard critic of that position. It is also noticed that their respective differences continue all the way to their respective understanding of the State of Nature.
