Answer:
GLOVER v. JOHNSON December 14th 1999 at Michigan
Explanation:
The court case mentioned above is exactly the court case that has ended with a decree being issued through the Michigan Department of Corrections for providing female inmates the access to the programming which has previously been allowed only to the male inmates. And this happened in 1999, and some big names were part of the jurisdiction. Its a very popular case definitely.
Answer:
Explanation:
Freeware and shareware programs are softwares which are either free of charge or consist of a free version for a certain trial period. These programs pose a threat of habouring malware or viruses which could damage one's computer and important files and programs. Therefore, it is imperative that carefulness is maintained when trying to get these softwares.
Some of the necessary safety conditions that should be taken include;
1) Appropriate research about the software including taking more about the vendors and reviews.
2.) Once, a healthy review has been identified ; the download can begin with the Downloader ensuring that the download is from the recommended site.
3) Prior to installation the software should be scanned with an active anti-virus program to determine if there is possibility that a virus has creeped in.
4.) Some softwares may require that computer anti-virus be turned off during installation, this is not always a good idea as this act leaves the system vulnerable a d badly exposed.
Answer:
I mean if your talking about games then just try Cool math I will give link in comments
Explanation:
Solution:
The HIPAA Privacy Rule establishes national standards to protect individuals' medical records and other personal health information and applies to health plans, health care clearinghouses, and those health care providers that conduct certain health care transactions electronically.
IT affects it by these ways:
The HIPAA Privacy Rule for the first time creates national standards to protect individuals’ medical records and other personal health information.
• It gives patients more control over their health information.
• It sets boundaries on the use and release of health records.
• It establishes appropriate safeguards that health care providers and others must achieve to protect the privacy of health information.
• It holds violators accountable, with civil and criminal penalties that can be imposed if they violate patients’ privacy rights.
• And it strikes a balance when public responsibility supports disclosure of some forms of data – for example, to protect public health.
This takes for patient.
• It enables patients to find out how their information may be used, and about certain disclosures of their information that have been made.
• It generally limits release of information to the minimum reasonably needed for the purpose of the disclosure.
• It generally gives patients the right to examine and obtain a copy of their own health records and request corrections.
