The correct answer to this open question is the following.
No, it is not ethical.
The risks that Emerald faces by not upholding his responsibility for the collection and payment of employment taxes is that, first of all, this is not correct. He has an obligation, a moral and a fiscal obligation to report on time the employment taxes. That is why his actions are not ethical although he indeed does pay before he gets caught. That decision could be a business decision to buy some time and trying t fix other problems, but a true leader does not need to cover things with wrongdoings. What can of example is he showing to his employees?
Later on, on another occasion, he won't have the moral authority to demand ethical behavior from his employees. He is not setting an example.
Absolute advantage is the ability to produce a good using fewer inputs than another producer, while comparative advantage is the ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer (reflecting the relative opportunity cost). One key difference is that one person can have an absolute advantage in both goods, but it is impossible for one person to have a comparative advantage in both goods due to the opportunity cost of a product being the inverse of the opportunity cost of the other.
Answer:
Let Sanguine Wines Ltd. refer to a hypothetical company for the purpose. Following would constitute Sanguine Wines Ltd's variable costs:
- Raw Material or input prices: The raw material or inputs of sanguine wines limited purchases from suppliers such as dried grapes, sugar and the likes. The price of such inputs is prone to seasonal fluctuation and thus variable
- The performance related incentive for employees for number of bottles of wine created, would be variable cost as it would vary with the no of bottles produced.
- Discount allowed to distributors which varies based upon the number of bottles purchased by them.
- Commission paid to wine salesperson which varies with respect to bottles sold.
Answer:
2 apples and 6 bottles of water
Explanation:
since Bervin earns K22, her consumption possibilities frontier is:
apple water total utils obtained
4 units 1 unit 90 + 20 = 110 utils
3 units 3 units 75 + 54 = 129 utils
2 units 6 units 55 + 90 = 145 utils
1 unit 8 units 30 + 98* = 128 utils
0 units 11 units 0 + 98* = 98 utils
The optimal combination of apples and bottles of water is 2 apples and 6 bottles of water because that combination yields the most utils.
*Since the table only states the utils obtained until the 7th unit, we must assume that any additional unit consumed will provide 0 utils.
Answer:
$1,369,200
Explanation:
Calculation for EBIT
Using this formula
Value of Equity= EBIT / WACC
Let plug in the formula
$16,300,000 = EBIT / .084
EBIT = .084($16,300,000)
EBIT = $1,369,200
Therefore EBIT is $1,369,200
