Część ćwiczenia jest odcięta, ale najwyżej można podać pierwsze kilka przykłady:
Hi Sue, what do you do?
I watch ...
I study ... After that, I read ...
How do you spend ...
Well, most days I wake up ... then I usually go ...
Compound-word prepositions<span> are made up of two or more words that act as adverb or those words that describe an action in terms of the setting, time, manner or frequency. The answer is </span>C. The lightning struck from out of the blue in which the compound-word preposition is "<span>from out of the blue"</span>
I would assume that the author does this to show how indifferent the person in the book is, she/he doesn’t know what they are in life, this makes it relatable to readers who have had this feeling before and it shows how the character is feeling in that moment
Answer:
The emergency caused the crisis team to exhaust all the response methods in its safety plan.
Explanation:
In simple terms, the word "exhaust" can mean "to use up" "to drain out" or "to make something tired. So, it simply means something that is used up to the brim, until there is nothing left.
According to the sentence from "Play", the word "exhaust" is used in such a way that it signifies or denotes how each play material must be used up to their limit before new material is given/ added. Similarly, in the same vein, the word "exhaust" can be used in the sentence where the emergency caused the response methods of safety plans to be used up.
Thus, the<u> correct use of the same word "exhaust" is seen in the last sentence.
</u>
The sentence that best corrects the original one is option 3) “Noticing that the patio table had been turned over by the storm, Anton flipped it back on its feet.”
In this option, we make it clear that the doer of the action (flipping back the table) is Anton and in the original sentence is not mentioned.
The first option is incorrect since it says that the storm flipped back the chair instead of Anton.
Option number two is also incorrect since the meaning is not clear, especially the 2nd part of the sentence.
And the last option is also incorrect because it uses the passive voice in both parts of the sentence, when it should be using acting voice in the 2nd part, making emphasis on the doer of the action (Anton) rather than on the action itself.
