Answer:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland:
-The Second Bank of the United States was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not tax a federal institution
2- Gibbons v. Ogden:
-The state of New York was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not regulate commercial activities between states.
-A state-granted one company exclusive rights over the Hudson river.
Explanation:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1819, in which the state of Maryland was barred from levying a tax on federal banks operating in its territory. As a result, the principle of federalism triumphed over state rights, while the constitutional "Necessary and Proper Clause," which allows Congress to carry out certain actions not expressly stated in the Constitution but that appear to conform with those permitted activities, remained in effect.
2- Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court decision from 1824 that upheld the federal government's authority to control interstate trade. This is due to a dispute between New York and New Jersey, which was supposed to be settled by municipal courts but ended up breaching the Supreme Court's original authority and the states' right to equality.
Marcus Garvey a controversial figure through a lifetime of events
The Greeks developed direct democracy and allowed citizens to choose their leaders and participate in decision making.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>B. Akbar
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Akbar was one of the most appreciated kings of the mighty Mughal Empire. He was known to be a king who tolerated other religions than Islam. He tried his best to win the affection of his people and tried to support all kinds of religious beliefs and rituals. He even authorised the construction of several temples, during his reign. During his rule, the Hindus were allowed to hold ranks in the empire. He believed in the policy of inclusion.
