Answer: El sistema capitalista defiende la libertad económica, la elección del consumidor y el crecimiento económico. ... En el socialismo, el estado controla la economía, y es responsable de reducir la desigualdad social, a través de programas que benefician a los pobres
or
The capitalist system defends economic freedom, consumer choice, and economic growth. ... In socialism , the state controls the economy, and is responsible for reducing social inequality, through programs that benefit the poor.
Answer:
Anthony most likely concludes her speech in this manner because she hopes to <em><u>convince the audience that women are entitled to the same rights as men.</u></em>
Explanation:
It can be seen in this passage, Anthony was trying to protect women's right by implying that they are also citizens and their privileges and immunities should not be curtailed by any laws. And in the conclusion, she did also mention the term "discrimination against women" (refers to any actions that refuse opportunities, privileges to a person (or a group) because of gender as female) and express the objection to that to show the advocacy for women's right.
The answer to this question is <span>Tesla released all their patents to help the electric car industry .
By releasing the patent, now Tesla has opened up a chance for other experts to analyze Tesla's design and imporve the chance of new discovery for that certain product. This will definitely make a lot of potential improvements for electric cars in the future even though Tesla will not has the sole ownership of it.
</span>
I believe that if we had lost our economy would have plummeted, the US would look completely different, and there would be much stricter rules. <span />
Answer:
James Madison
Explanation:
HJames Madison, based on his experience and knowledge, he concluded that there is dangers inherent in the powerful state legislatures and of the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. Thus, in the year 1787, in his essay, Federalist 45, Madison developed an argument about whether the expanded powers of the national government benefits or hinders policy making.
He argued that the proper division of power itself hinder the threats to our liberties because officials at both levels of government; state and federal, would jostle for citizens’ favour.
