1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mart [117]
3 years ago
15

Plato was a Roman philosopher true or false

History
2 answers:
lina2011 [118]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: False.

Explanation: Plato used to be an Athenian philosopher in Ancient Greece.

goldfiish [28.3K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

false

Explanation:

Plato was an Athenian philosopher during the Classical period in Ancient Greece

You might be interested in
What effects did communism have at home during the cold war
natita [175]

Answer:

The Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union had broad implications on the American homefront. Old fears and prejudices were rekindled and the new, very real, threat of nuclear war impacted public policies as well as the daily lives of people across the country.

Explanation:

hope this helps you :)

4 0
2 years ago
Question 6(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
Alla [95]

Answer:

U.S department of State

Explanation:

The U.S department of state maintains internal n external affairs...This department reserves foreign policy, economic relations, Trade and commerce and military operations..

8 0
2 years ago
(NEED HELP) In this assignment, you will write a three- to four-paragraph Supreme Court opinion for
liberstina [14]

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane D. Kirstein, U .S. Attorney's Office, San Antonio, TX, Plaintiff–Appellee. Laura G. Greenberg, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Bradford W. Bogan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender's Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant–Appellant.

In this case, we must decide whether the district court's imposition of a condition of supervised release prohibiting the defendant from “residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer” was plainly erroneous. We conclude it was not and AFFIRM.

I.

In January 1990, Michael Fields was convicted in Wisconsin state court of second degree sexual assault of a child.1 He was sentenced to five years in prison, but only served one year; the rest of his term was probated. Fields was required to register as a sex offender in Wisconsin for the rest of his life. Because of this conviction, he must also register as a sex offender in Texas. Fields has thrice been arrested and convicted for failing to register as a sex offender.2 He has also been repeatedly told by state authorities in both Wisconsin and Texas that he must register as a sex offender, instructions with which it appears he has never complied.3

Fields was arrested by the Austin Police Department for failing to register as a sex offender in April 2013. The next month, he was indicted in federal court and charged with one count of failing to register as a sex offender in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”).4 After unsuccessfully moving to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that SORNA was unconstitutional, Fields pled guilty in July 2013.

In November 2013, Fields appeared before the district court for his sentencing hearing. At that hearing, the court reviewed Fields's criminal history record, and concluded that, even discounting several convictions where it was disputed as to whether Fields committed the crime, he had “a solid criminal record since 1974.” After hearing from counsel, the court then sentenced Fields to a 27–month sentence of imprisonment, followed by ten years of supervised release. The supervision included a number of conditions, including, as relevant here, a requirement that:

The defendant shall follow all other lifestyle restrictions or treatment requirements imposed by the therapist, and continue those restrictions as they pertain to avoiding risk situations throughout the course of supervision. This includes not residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer.

Fields did not object to this condition. This timely appeal follows.

II.

We normally review conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion.5 In this case, because Fields did not object to his supervised release condition while before the district court, we review for plain error.6 As the Supreme Court has made clear, plain error is a demanding standard:

6 0
3 years ago
What animal do giraffes originate from?
mash [69]
Camelopardalis.....??
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What kind of knowledge does the possibility that he is dreaming raise doubts about, for Descartes?
Alex_Xolod [135]

Answer:

none of the above .....

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What subject would a geologist be most concerned with?
    15·1 answer
  • Native-born Americans lobbied government officials to control the immigrant population. true or false?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the wind rush scandal ?
    11·1 answer
  • how did glasnost affect eastern europe? a. it increased the threat of nuclear war. b. it ended the salt treaty. c. it allowed co
    7·1 answer
  • Why is Greek so famous
    15·2 answers
  • Which Amendment did Edward Snowden claim project PRISM was violating?
    7·1 answer
  • What are the arguments for and against appointing judges for life terms?
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP FAST
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a consequence of the focus
    5·1 answer
  • Why did ancient Mesopotamia came to be known as the fertile crescent
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!