I'm pretty sure its passion
Answer:
$15 million
Explanation:
The three investors' total investments would add up to 100% or 1.
The first two invested in the ration of 2:3
It means ;
Investor 1: 2/5
Investor 2: 3/5
If investor 3 invested twice as investor 1 and 2, then we can deduce that he invested ( 2/5 + 3/5) x 2
the new denominator is 10, meaning
Investor 1 had 2/10,
investor 2 had 3/10
investor 3 had 5/10
If total investments were $30 million, then the highest investor invested
5/10 x $30million
=0.5 x $30 million
=$15 million
Answer:
b. $200
Explanation:
The computation of the individual performance is shown below:
= Total sales ÷ number of shift hours
= $1,200 ÷ 6 hours
= $200
It means that per hour, the individual performance is $200
We simply divide the total sales by the number of shift hours, so that the sales per hour can determined
It shows a relationship between the total sales and the number of shift hours
Answer:
There will be a difference in the income .
Absorption costing income will be lower as it transfers all the fixed costs to the ending inventory.
Variable costing income will be higher as it does not transfer the fixed costs to the ending inventory.
The difference will be of $ 104000
Explanation:
Increase in units 8000
Variable Fixed
Unit manufacturing costs of the period $24.00 $10.00
Unit operating expenses of the period 8.00 3.00
Total Unit Costs $ 32.00 $ 13.00
The net operating income under variable costing for the year will be $ 13* 8000= $ 104000 Lower than the net operating income under absorption costing. This is because the all fixed costs will be treated as period cost rather than product costs.
In variable costing the ending inventory will be $104000 lower than the ending inventory under absorption costing because the fixed costs will not be allocated to products.
Under variable costing, the units in the ending inventory will be costed at $32 each.Under absorption costing, the units in the ending inventory will be costed at $32+ $ 13= $ 45 each.
